From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 22 May 2001 10:33:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 22 May 2001 10:33:33 -0400 Received: from humbolt.nl.linux.org ([131.211.28.48]:4619 "EHLO humbolt.nl.linux.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 22 May 2001 10:33:17 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: "Ricardo Galli" , Subject: Re: New XFS, ReiserFS and Ext2 benchmarks Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 12:29:13 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] Cc: , , "Guillem Cantallops Ramis" In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01052212291305.06233@starship> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 22 May 2001 04:41, Ricardo Galli wrote: > Hi, > you can find at http://bulma.lug.net/static/ a few new benchmarks > among Reiser, XFS and Ext2 (also one with JFS). > > This time there is a comprehensive Hans' Mongo benchmarks > (http://bulma.lug.net/static/mongo/ )and a couple of kernel > compilations and read/write/fsync operations tests (I was very > careful of populating the cache before the measures for the last two > cases). The measured create and rename times for Ext2 look pretty silly, don't they? OK, I know that my htree directory index patch isn't part of Ext2 yet, but at least lets mention that this is a solved problem. http://nl.linux.org/~phillips/htree -- Daniel