From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 22 May 2001 11:30:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 22 May 2001 11:30:04 -0400 Received: from humbolt.nl.linux.org ([131.211.28.48]:49420 "EHLO humbolt.nl.linux.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 22 May 2001 11:29:48 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: "Ricardo Galli" , Subject: Re: New XFS, ReiserFS and Ext2 benchmarks Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 17:29:57 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] Cc: , , "Guillem Cantallops Ramis" , Rik van Riel In-Reply-To: <01052212291305.06233@starship> In-Reply-To: <01052212291305.06233@starship> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0105221729570A.06233@starship> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 22 May 2001 12:29, Daniel Phillips wrote: > The measured create and rename times for Ext2 look pretty silly, > don't they? OK, I know that my htree directory index patch isn't part > of Ext2 yet, but at least lets mention that this is a solved problem. > > http://nl.linux.org/~phillips/htree Oops, nl.linux.org was down for 'unscheduled maintainance' and seems to have come back up with some some http issues. Rik? -- Daniel