From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 29 May 2001 11:31:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 29 May 2001 11:31:14 -0400 Received: from mail3.home.nl ([213.51.129.227]:12732 "EHLO mail3.home.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 29 May 2001 11:31:01 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: elko To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Plain 2.4.5 VM... Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 17:37:17 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: X-Owner: ElkOS MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01052917371700.32333@ElkOS> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 29 May 2001 11:10, Alan Cox wrote: > > It's not a bug. It's a feature. It only breaks systems that are run w= > > ith "too > > little" swap, and the only difference from 2.2 till now is, that the de= > > finition > > of "too little" changed. > > its a giant bug. Or do you want to add 128Gb of unused swap to a full > kitted out Xeon box - or 512Gb to a big athlon ??? this bug is biting me too and I do NOT like it ! if it's a *giant* bug, then why is LK-2.4 called a *stable* kernel ?? -- Elko Holl