From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 08:42:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 08:42:37 -0400 Received: from mout0.freenet.de ([194.97.50.131]:30636 "EHLO mout0.freenet.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 08:42:26 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Andreas Hartmann Organization: Privat To: Rasmus =?iso-8859-1?q?B=F8g=20Hansen?= Subject: Re: [2.4.5 and all ac-Patches] massive file corruption with reiser or NFS Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 14:41:04 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] Cc: Kernel-Mailingliste In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01060214363800.02172@athlon> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by susi.maya.org id f52Cf5A08134 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Samstag, 2. Juni 2001 12:52 schrieb Rasmus Bøg Hansen: > On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, Andreas Hartmann wrote: > > I got massive file corruptions with the kernels mentioned in the subject. > > I can reproduce it every time. > > You cannot use NFS on reiserfs unless you apply the knfsd patch. Look at > www.namesys.com. Thank you very much for your advice. I tested your suggestion and run the machine without NFS-mounted devices - it seems to be working fine. Anyway - I'm wondering why I didn't get any problem until 2.4.4ac10 with this configuration without the appropriate patch on the client or on the server? I'm a little bit confused now about this patch. Do I need this knfsd-patch for the NFS-server or just for the clients or for both? Thank you for your advice, Andreas Hartmann