From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 22:11:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 22:10:56 -0400 Received: from HSE-MTL-ppp71904.qc.sympatico.ca ([64.229.198.221]:2198 "HELO oscar.casa.dyndns.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 22:10:45 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Ed Tomlinson Organization: me To: linux-lvm@sistina.com Subject: LVM status in ac7? Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 22:10:40 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] Cc: Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Heinz J. Mauelshagen" MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01060222104000.23925@oscar> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, What is the status of LVM in ac7? Is it safe to use the ac7 LVM code on a system currently using beta7? Is the beta7 patched needed with ac7? What is not in the ac7 patches? Is it apt to cause problems? TIA, Ed Tomlinson