From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S263055AbRFEA6b>; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 20:58:31 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S263058AbRFEA6V>; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 20:58:21 -0400
Received: from mail08.voicenet.com ([207.103.0.34]:62869 "HELO
	mail08.voicenet.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id <S263055AbRFEA6K>; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 20:58:10 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: safemode <safemode@voicenet.com>
To: William Montgomery <william@opinicus.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
Subject: Re: lowlatency 2.2.19
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 20:58:08 -0400
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1010604173410.5728A-100000@thing2.opinicus.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1010604173410.5728A-100000@thing2.opinicus.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01060420580802.31206@psuedomode>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

this is just a general question about low latency patches on 2.2,   I 
remember hearing about low latency patches for 2.4 not playing well with X 
4.x, is this true for 2.2 low latency patches as well?