From: Ed Tomlinson <tomlins@cam.org>
To: Wayne Whitney <whitney@math.berkeley.edu>,
kaos@ocs.com.au, Ed Tomlinson <tomlins@cam.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: missing symbol do_softirq in net moduels for pre-2
Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 13:04:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01060913041000.01756@oscar> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01060911075200.00993@oscar> <16339.992103452@ocs4.ocs-net> <200106091656.f59Gurx10167@adsl-209-76-109-63.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net>
In-Reply-To: <200106091656.f59Gurx10167@adsl-209-76-109-63.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net>
On Saturday 09 June 2001 12:56, Wayne Whitney wrote:
> In mailing-lists.linux-kernel, Keith Owens wrote:
> > On Sat, 9 Jun 2001 Ed Tomlinson <tomlins@cam.org> wrote:
> > > Built -pre2 and noticed most of the modules in net/* are getting
> > > a missing symbol for do_softirq.
> >
> > http://www.tux.org/lkml/#s8-8
>
> Hmm, I don't think this is it--I'm seeing the same thing, and I have
> tried 'make mrproper'. All symbols are getting versionated except
> certain calls to do_softirq() in, e.g., sunrpc.o and the iptables
> modules.
>
> I looked into this, and I believe the problem is due to 2.4.6-pre2's
> change to the i386 local_bh_enable() macro--the C version has been
> replaced with an assembly language version that does "call
> do_doftirq;". Perhaps this function call from the assembly language
> version does not get versionated?
In my case its off a clean tree patched with lvm, ide patches, dma timeout
retry patch and reiserfs fixes. Did we not have a problem a while back
in ac with versioned symbols in assembly?
Ed Tomlinson
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-06-09 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-06-09 15:07 missing symbol do_softirq in net moduels for pre-2 Ed Tomlinson
2001-06-09 16:17 ` Keith Owens
2001-06-09 16:56 ` Thomas Langås
2001-06-09 17:04 ` Keith Owens
2001-06-09 17:20 ` Ed Tomlinson
2001-06-09 18:13 ` Wayne Whitney
2001-06-09 18:28 ` Keith Owens
2001-06-09 16:56 ` Wayne Whitney
2001-06-09 17:04 ` Ed Tomlinson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=01060913041000.01756@oscar \
--to=tomlins@cam.org \
--cc=kaos@ocs.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=whitney@math.berkeley.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox