From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>
To: "Richard B. Johnson" <root@chaos.analogic.com>,
Rob Landley <landley@webofficenow.com>
Cc: Tony Hoyle <tmh@magenta-netlogic.com>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>,
Russell Leighton <russell.leighton@247media.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Subject: Re: [OT] Threads, inelegance, and Java
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 23:00:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0106202300070E.00439@starship> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.1010620162210.18873A-100000@chaos.analogic.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.1010620162210.18873A-100000@chaos.analogic.com>
On Wednesday 20 June 2001 22:40, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> Interesting... Hmmm. The first Flight Simulator to run on a PC
> ran on a 4.47 MHz PC/XT. The core state-machine ran off the BIOS
> timer-tick at 18.206 ticks/second. It was written in MASM by me.
> The graphics was written by many PROGRAM EXCHANGE contributors and
> was written in Turbo Pascal. I was the "SysOp" of that BBS system
> in the days when the Internet was nothing more than a college-to
> -college experiment.
>
> It required 256k or RAM and had the flight dynamics of a real
> Cessna 150 airplane.
I could have sworn I ran it on a 64K machine.
Now, how did Bruce Artwick and Sublogic fit into this?
--
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-06-20 20:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 152+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-06-19 14:53 accounting for threads Dan Kegel
2001-06-19 14:57 ` J . A . Magallon
2001-06-19 15:44 ` ognen
2001-06-19 15:58 ` Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads) Dan Kegel
2001-06-19 16:02 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-19 16:12 ` Padraig Brady
2001-06-19 19:10 ` bert hubert
2001-06-19 19:18 ` Alan Cox
2001-06-19 19:32 ` bert hubert
2001-06-19 19:43 ` Alexander Viro
2001-06-20 15:22 ` Jes Sorensen
2001-06-20 15:33 ` Alexander Viro
2001-06-20 15:59 ` Threads are processes that share more bert hubert
2001-06-20 16:15 ` Alexander Viro
2001-06-20 18:48 ` Martin Devera
2001-06-20 19:19 ` Unknown PCI Net Device Greg Ingram
2001-06-20 22:53 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-06-20 22:56 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-06-20 23:00 ` Alan Cox
2001-06-20 22:08 ` Threads are processes that share more Stephen Satchell
2001-06-20 22:14 ` ognen
2001-06-20 23:10 ` J . A . Magallon
2001-06-24 23:47 ` Larry McVoy
2001-06-25 2:23 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-20 16:39 ` Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads) george anzinger
2001-06-20 18:35 ` Alexander Viro
2001-06-21 4:11 ` Rusty Russell
2001-06-21 23:37 ` Alexander Viro
2001-06-21 23:55 ` Alexander Viro
2001-06-22 14:53 ` Richard Gooch
2001-06-20 16:40 ` Jes Sorensen
2001-06-20 20:09 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-20 19:05 ` Victor Yodaiken
2001-06-20 14:35 ` Mike Porter
2001-06-20 11:56 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-19 16:02 ` Ben Pfaff
2001-06-19 16:09 ` Larry McVoy
2001-06-19 16:26 ` Matthew Kirkwood
2001-06-19 16:52 ` Larry McVoy
2001-06-19 18:18 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-19 23:31 ` Timur Tabi
2001-06-20 11:52 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-20 21:20 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-06-20 18:12 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-20 23:28 ` Dan Podeanu
2001-06-21 0:42 ` D. Stimits
2001-06-20 20:18 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-21 1:57 ` D. Stimits
2001-06-21 14:46 ` Idea: Patches-from-linus mailing list? (Was Re: Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads)) Rob Landley
2001-06-21 14:02 ` Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads) Jesse Pollard
2001-06-21 14:18 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-22 14:46 ` Mikulas Patocka
2001-06-22 13:29 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-24 21:41 ` J . A . Magallon
2001-06-24 16:55 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-24 22:30 ` J . A . Magallon
2001-06-24 18:21 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-25 13:48 ` J . A . Magallon
2001-06-24 22:39 ` Steven Walter
2001-06-24 23:50 ` Larry McVoy
2001-06-24 20:24 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-25 0:05 ` J . A . Magallon
2001-06-25 0:32 ` Gerhard Mack
2001-06-25 0:59 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-06-25 2:18 ` Galen Hancock
2001-06-20 14:59 ` Matthias Urlichs
2001-06-20 19:14 ` Victor Yodaiken
2001-06-20 21:01 ` RE:Why use threads ( was: Alan Cox quote?) David Schwartz
2001-06-20 21:26 ` Why " Victor Yodaiken
2001-06-20 22:18 ` David Schwartz
2001-06-20 22:41 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-06-20 22:47 ` [OT] " Jeff Garzik
2001-06-21 0:21 ` David Schwartz
2001-06-21 0:56 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-06-21 1:32 ` David Schwartz
2001-06-21 2:22 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-06-21 2:43 ` David Schwartz
2001-06-21 16:10 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-06-21 19:55 ` Marco Colombo
2001-06-20 22:43 ` Mike Castle
2001-06-21 1:43 ` David Schwartz
2001-06-19 17:10 ` Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads) Matti Aarnio
2001-06-19 17:20 ` Mike Castle
2001-06-19 17:37 ` Larry McVoy
2001-06-19 17:45 ` Mike Castle
2001-06-19 18:08 ` Georg Nikodym
2001-06-19 19:38 ` Georg Nikodym
2001-06-19 19:56 ` Michael Meissner
2001-06-19 17:53 ` Steve Underwood
2001-06-19 19:01 ` Alan Cox
2001-06-20 2:57 ` Michael Rothwell
2001-06-20 3:04 ` Larry McVoy
2001-06-20 3:38 ` John R Lenton
2001-06-20 10:21 ` john slee
2001-06-20 18:08 ` Larry McVoy
2001-06-20 16:21 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-06-20 9:14 ` Alan Cox
2001-06-22 2:36 ` Michael Rothwell
2001-06-19 17:36 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-06-19 17:41 ` Larry McVoy
2001-06-19 20:57 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-19 21:11 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-06-19 21:15 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-19 23:56 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-06-20 0:19 ` Mike Castle
2001-06-20 0:28 ` Larry McVoy
2001-06-20 1:30 ` Ben Greear
2001-06-20 2:14 ` Mike Castle
2001-06-20 9:00 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2001-06-20 11:25 ` [OT] Threads, inelegance, and Java Aaron Lehmann
2001-06-20 11:25 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-20 17:36 ` Martin Dalecki
2001-06-20 19:27 ` Mike Harrold
2001-06-20 17:46 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-20 19:53 ` Martin Dalecki
2001-06-20 17:53 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-21 7:45 ` Albert D. Cahalan
[not found] ` <mailman.993067219.29993.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com>
2001-06-20 20:16 ` Pete Zaitcev
2001-06-20 22:05 ` Alan Cox
[not found] ` <20010621000725.A24672@werewolf.able.es>
2001-06-20 19:15 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-21 9:40 ` Jonathan Morton
[not found] ` <mailman.993083762.1429.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com>
2001-06-21 3:13 ` Pete Zaitcev
2001-06-21 13:59 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-21 16:48 ` Adam Sampson
2001-06-20 15:12 ` Ben Greear
2001-06-20 15:44 ` Russell Leighton
2001-06-20 16:32 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-06-20 16:54 ` Russell Leighton
2001-06-20 17:03 ` Tony Hoyle
2001-06-20 15:10 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-20 20:23 ` Tony Hoyle
2001-06-21 8:12 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2001-06-20 20:40 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-06-20 20:48 ` Tony Hoyle
2001-06-20 21:00 ` Daniel Phillips [this message]
2001-06-20 21:06 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-06-20 18:14 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2001-06-20 16:53 ` Larry McVoy
2001-06-20 12:36 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-20 21:14 ` Aaron Lehmann
2001-06-20 18:09 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2001-06-20 19:05 ` William T Wilson
2001-06-20 0:04 ` Alan Cox quote? (was: Re: accounting for threads) Chris Ricker
2001-06-20 0:59 ` Robert Love
2001-06-19 18:01 ` Alan Cox quote? Kai Henningsen
2001-06-19 18:49 ` Larry McVoy
2001-06-19 21:12 ` Richard Gooch
2001-06-19 22:50 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2001-06-19 20:12 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-06-20 21:13 [OT] Threads, inelegance, and Java Holzrichter, Bruce
2001-06-20 21:17 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-06-21 4:10 Dan Kegel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0106202300070E.00439@starship \
--to=phillips@bonn-fries.net \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=landley@webofficenow.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=root@chaos.analogic.com \
--cc=russell.leighton@247media.com \
--cc=tmh@magenta-netlogic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox