From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 18:00:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 17:58:53 -0400 Received: from 216-60-128-137.ati.utexas.edu ([216.60.128.137]:31644 "HELO tsunami.webofficenow.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 17:58:25 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Rob Landley Reply-To: landley@webofficenow.com To: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman), landley@webofficenow.com Subject: Re: Microsoft and Xenix. Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 06:36:46 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] Cc: Alan Chandler , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <01062310075401.00696@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01062406364601.01519@localhost.localdomain> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Saturday 23 June 2001 22:47, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Rob Landley writes: > > Ummm... GEM was the Geos stuff? (Yeah I remember it, I haven't > > researched it yet though...) > > GEM was a gui from Digital Research I believe. > Geoworks/Geos was a seperate entity. Ah, the DR-DOS answer to dosshell/windows. Cool. (I used Dr. Dos byt never tried its gui.) I know the geos had nothing to do with digital, it started as a windowing GUI for the commodore 64, if you can believe that... > It's been a long time since I looked but they both run fine under > dosemu... I don't suppose you've got reference to literature or some such? I'd love to work this into my huge obnoxious data tree I'm building... Rob