From: Rob Landley <landley@webofficenow.com>
To: Mike Castle <dalgoda@ix.netcom.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Microsoft and Xenix.
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 10:44:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0106241044060C.01519@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010623200727.A5272@thune.mrc-home.com>
In-Reply-To: <20010623200727.A5272@thune.mrc-home.com>
On Saturday 23 June 2001 23:07, Mike Castle wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 09:41:29PM -0500, Wayne.Brown@altec.com wrote:
> > Ah, yes, the RT/PC. That brings back some fond memories. My first
> > exposure to Unix was with AIX on the RT. I still have some of those
> > weird-sized RT AIX manuals around somewhere...
>
> We always ran AOS on RT's. Actually, the server was the only RT, the rest
> were some other model that was basically a PS/2 (286) that booted DOS, then
> booted the other same chip that the RT used that was on a daughter card.
>
> AOS was basically IBM's version of BSD. Academic Operating System.
Now if somebody here could just point me to a decent reference on A/UX -
Apple's mid-80's version of Unix (for the early macintosh, I believe...)
A big thing I'm trying to show in my book is that Unix has been, for almost
thirty years, the standard against which everything else was compared. Even
when it wasn't what people were directly using it's what the techies were
thinking about when they designed their other stuff. (That and the Xerox
Parc work...)
Let's see, the real earthquakes in the computing world (off the top of my
head) are:
MIT: project whirlwind (which got computing off of vacuum tubes, spawned DEC,
and Minsky's hacker lab. Gurus too numerous to mention.)
Bell Labs: (the transistor, and 20 years later Unix. Gurus ken thompson,
dennis ritchie, the three transistor guys, ).
DARPA: (Arpanet (BBN), funded project MAC at MIT, and Multics which brought
the MIT stuff to bell labs.)
Xerox Parc (WIMP interface, WYSIWYG word processing/printing/desktop
publishing, object oriented programming,
The integrated circuit/microchip (Texas Instruments' manufacturing
innovation, which led to the Intel 4004, which eventually led to the Altair,
which led to the personal computer. Moore's Law would probably be the theme
here...)
The whole free software thing (Berkeley in the 70's to early 80's, Stallman
and the FSF taking over from there. And Andrew Tanenbaum's Minix, which
spawned Linux...)
Huh, I'd have to mention IBM (forget the PC, how about the winchester
drive?), and of course the AT&T breakup (a negative earthquake, but big
anyway, sort of leading to the commercialization of the software side of
things, although Gates was trying that already. AT&T just removed a lot of
the roadblocks by shattering the opposition for a while.)
Alright, I need to sit down and make an outline and a timeline. I admit
this... (Collecting the data is the easy part. ORGANIZING this fermenting
heap of disconnected facts and observations is the hard part...)
> mrc
Rob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-06-24 21:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-06-24 2:41 Microsoft and Xenix Wayne.Brown
2001-06-24 3:07 ` Mike Castle
2001-06-24 14:44 ` Rob Landley [this message]
2001-06-25 15:13 ` Joel Jaeggli
2001-06-25 14:17 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-25 19:57 ` Erik Mouw
2001-06-27 2:10 ` Steve Underwood
2001-06-25 19:30 ` Kai Henningsen
2001-06-25 20:19 ` asmith
2001-06-26 14:44 ` [comphist] " Rob Landley
2001-06-26 20:49 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-06-26 20:52 ` Alan Cox
2001-06-26 21:21 ` Michael Meissner
2001-06-27 13:26 ` Jesse Pollard
2001-06-27 23:35 ` [OT] " Guest section DW
2001-06-24 14:32 ` Rob Landley
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-06-26 3:21 Jocelyn Mayer
2001-06-26 15:15 ` Joel Jaeggli
2001-06-26 16:15 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-06-26 16:42 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-25 17:29 Wayne.Brown
2001-06-25 2:51 Wayne.Brown
2001-06-24 23:21 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-25 17:14 ` asmith
2001-06-25 14:54 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-24 2:59 Wayne.Brown
2001-06-22 22:41 Alan Chandler
2001-06-23 14:07 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-24 0:13 ` Michael Alan Dorman
2001-06-24 14:18 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-25 1:45 ` Jeff Dike
2001-06-24 20:51 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-24 0:49 ` John Adams
2001-06-24 14:25 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-24 2:47 ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-06-24 10:36 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-24 22:41 ` Chris Meadors
2001-06-25 0:55 ` William T Wilson
2001-06-25 17:11 ` asmith
2001-06-25 18:18 ` Robert J.Dunlop
2001-06-25 3:17 ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-07-02 10:04 ` Juan Quintela
2001-06-25 19:23 ` Kai Henningsen
2001-06-26 15:16 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-26 21:26 ` Michael Meissner
2001-06-27 8:09 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2001-06-27 18:07 ` Peter De Schrijver
2001-06-27 13:43 ` Peter Bergner
2001-06-28 21:11 ` Thomas Dodd
2001-06-23 17:57 ` Mike Jagdis
2001-06-23 17:11 ` Rob Landley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0106241044060C.01519@localhost.localdomain \
--to=landley@webofficenow.com \
--cc=dalgoda@ix.netcom.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox