From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 11:06:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 11:05:54 -0400 Received: from humbolt.nl.linux.org ([131.211.28.48]:54788 "EHLO humbolt.nl.linux.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 11:05:46 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Holger Lubitz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 17:09:05 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] In-Reply-To: <9hfter$9e7$1@ncc1701.cistron.net> <3B3C85FD.B018746D@internet-factory.de> In-Reply-To: <3B3C85FD.B018746D@internet-factory.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0106291709050D.00419@starship> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 29 June 2001 15:43, Holger Lubitz wrote: > A boot parameter for the verbosity would be ok, though. But I'd still > vote for the default to be pretty verbose. Leave it to the distributors > to disable it, if they want. > > After all - how often does the average linux machine boot? Once a day at > most. Mine usually run until the next kernel upgrade. But then again, > I'm not a kernel hacker, so this is to be taken more as a users point of > view. Many new Linux users go through an extended period of dual-booting. -- Daniel