From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 20:10:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 20:10:00 -0400 Received: from humbolt.nl.linux.org ([131.211.28.48]:15880 "EHLO humbolt.nl.linux.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 20:09:53 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Jeff Dike , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: all processes waiting in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE state Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 02:12:11 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] Cc: mistral@stev.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, rcastro@ime.usp.br, abali@us.ibm.com, riel@conectiva.com.br, phillips@bonn-fries.net, viro@math.psu.edu In-Reply-To: <200106292040.PAA03583@ccure.karaya.com> In-Reply-To: <200106292040.PAA03583@ccure.karaya.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01063002121100.10025@starship> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 29 June 2001 22:40, Jeff Dike wrote: > The bug was UML-specific and specific in such a way that I don't think it's > possible to find the bug in the native kernel by making analogies from the > UML bug. Heh, too bad, there goes that chance to show uml bagging a major kernel bug. But it's just a matter of time... -- Daniel