public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roberto Arcomano <berto@fatamorgana.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Patch suggestion for proxy arp on shaper interface
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 22:31:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <01072222314006.01071@berto.casa.it> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2210 bytes --]

Hi all,
Recently I have had a problem with Linux proxy arp feature (using with shaper 
interface): when I machine starts up it was receiving a "IP conflits".
The problem is that Linux proxy_arp routine doesn't make difference between 
real interface (i.e. eth0) and shaper interface (i.e. shaper0 which has been 
attached to eth0).
I attach a first beta solution to the problem, which could be far from 
optimal! (I use a "strncmp", cause I didn't found another method to know if 
the device is a "shaper" device).


--- arp.c.orig  Wed May 16 19:21:45 2001
+++ arp.c       Sun Jul 22 19:31:20 2001
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@
 
 #include <asm/system.h>
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
-
+#include <linux/if_shaper.h>
 
 
 /*
@@ -767,10 +767,17 @@
                        }
                        goto out;
                } else if (IN_DEV_FORWARD(in_dev)) {
+                        char shflag=0;
+                        if ( (rt->u.dst.dev) &&
+                            (rt->u.dst.dev->priv) &&
+                            (((struct shaper *) rt->u.dst.dev->priv)->dev) &&
+                            (strncmp(rt->u.dst.dev->name,"shaper",6)==0) )
+                         shflag=1;
                        if ((rt->rt_flags&RTCF_DNAT) ||
-                           (addr_type == RTN_UNICAST  && rt->u.dst.dev != 
dev &&
+                           (addr_type == RTN_UNICAST  &&
+                           ( ((shflag) && ( ((struct shaper *) 
rt->u.dst.dev->priv)->dev != dev)) || ((!shflag) && (rt->u.dst.dev != dev)) ) 
&&
                             (IN_DEV_PROXY_ARP(in_dev) || 
pneigh_lookup(&arp_tbl, &tip, dev, 0)))) {
-                               n = neigh_event_ns(&arp_tbl, sha, &sip, dev);
+                               n = neigh_event_ns(&arp_tbl, sha, &sip, dev);
                                if (n)


The patch declare a variable (flag to know if the interface is shaper-like), 
investigate on private data of shaper device (where we can know what is the 
attached interface) and set the flag. After we consider the "attached" 
interface if flag is set.

I tested it under 2.4.6 on RedHat 7.1 with success (there is no more IP 
conflit).
Hope it'll useful.

Best Regards
Roberto Arcomano

[-- Attachment #2: diff file --]
[-- Type: text/x-c, Size: 1014 bytes --]

--- arp.c.orig	Wed May 16 19:21:45 2001
+++ arp.c	Sun Jul 22 19:31:20 2001
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@
 
 #include <asm/system.h>
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
-
+#include <linux/if_shaper.h>
 
 
 /*
@@ -767,10 +767,17 @@
 			}
 			goto out;
 		} else if (IN_DEV_FORWARD(in_dev)) {
+                        char shflag=0;
+                        if ( (rt->u.dst.dev) &&
+			     (rt->u.dst.dev->priv) &&
+			     (((struct shaper *) rt->u.dst.dev->priv)->dev) &&
+			     (strncmp(rt->u.dst.dev->name,"shaper",6)==0) )
+			  shflag=1;
 			if ((rt->rt_flags&RTCF_DNAT) ||
-			    (addr_type == RTN_UNICAST  && rt->u.dst.dev != dev &&
+			    (addr_type == RTN_UNICAST  && 
+			    ( ((shflag) && ( ((struct shaper *) rt->u.dst.dev->priv)->dev != dev)) || ((!shflag) && (rt->u.dst.dev != dev)) ) &&
 			     (IN_DEV_PROXY_ARP(in_dev) || pneigh_lookup(&arp_tbl, &tip, dev, 0)))) {
-				n = neigh_event_ns(&arp_tbl, sha, &sip, dev);
+			        n = neigh_event_ns(&arp_tbl, sha, &sip, dev);
 				if (n)
 					neigh_release(n);
 

             reply	other threads:[~2001-07-22 20:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-07-22 20:31 Roberto Arcomano [this message]
2001-07-24 10:10 ` Patch suggestion for proxy arp on shaper interface Roberto Arcomano
2001-07-24 22:31 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2001-07-25 18:06   ` Roberto Arcomano
     [not found] <01072520050001.01036@berto.casa.it>
2001-07-25 18:54 ` kuznet
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-07-26  0:34 Roberto Arcomano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=01072222314006.01071@berto.casa.it \
    --to=berto@fatamorgana.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox