From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>
To: Patrick Dreker <patrick@dreker.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
phillips@bonn-fries.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Optimization for use-once pages
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 02:18:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0107250218020A.00520@starship> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200107241648.f6OGmqp29445@penguin.transmeta.com> <E15P8jB-0000Au-00@wintermute>
In-Reply-To: <E15P8jB-0000Au-00@wintermute>
On Tuesday 24 July 2001 22:24, Patrick Dreker wrote:
> I just decided to give this patch a try, as I have written a little
> application which does some statistics over traces dumped by another
> program by mmap()ing a large file and reading it sequentially. The
> trace file to be analyzed is about 240 megs in size and consists of
> records each 249 bytes long. The analysis program opens and the
> mmap()s the trace file doing some small calculations on the data
> (basically it adds up fields from the records to get overall values).
>
> I have tested this on my Athlon 600 with 128 Megs of RAM, and it does
> not make any difference whether I use plain 2.4.7 or 2.4.5-use-once.
> The program always takes about 1 minute 6 seconds (+- 2 seconds) to
> complete, and the machine starts swapping out stuff
In this case that's an excellent result:
- The optimization doesn't include mmap's (yet)
- It doesn't break swap. (Good, I didn't check that myself)
This is a case of "no news is good news".
> (thus I have
> omitted further stats like vmstat output). I have just taken another
> look into my program to verify it does not do something silly, like
> keeping old data around, but the program cycle is always the same:
> copy a record from the mmap into a struct, perform analysis, and copy
> next record. The struct is always reused for the next struct (so
> there is only one struct at any time).
>
> I can do further tests, if someone asks me to. I could even modify
> the analysis program to check changes in behaviour...
(Already read your mail where you picked up the 20% improvement,
thanks, it warms my heart:-)
--
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-25 1:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-24 3:47 [RFC] Optimization for use-once pages Daniel Phillips
2001-07-24 12:38 ` jlnance
2001-07-24 16:56 ` Rik van Riel
2001-07-25 0:04 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-25 0:43 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-07-25 1:30 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-25 21:18 ` Steve Lord
2001-07-24 16:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-24 17:04 ` Rik van Riel
2001-07-24 18:14 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-24 18:15 ` Rik van Riel
2001-07-24 19:41 ` Is /dev/epoll scheduled for official inclusion anytime soon? David E. Weekly
2001-07-24 20:05 ` Rik van Riel
2001-07-24 20:26 ` linux partitioning in IA64 hiufungeric.tse
2001-07-25 9:29 ` Mike A. Harris
2001-07-24 20:24 ` [RFC] Optimization for use-once pages Patrick Dreker
2001-07-24 20:32 ` Rik van Riel
2001-07-24 22:16 ` Patrick Dreker
2001-07-24 22:25 ` Rik van Riel
2001-07-25 0:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-25 8:20 ` Patrick Dreker
2001-07-25 12:57 ` Martin Devera
2001-07-25 14:16 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-24 20:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-25 1:25 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-25 0:18 ` Daniel Phillips [this message]
2001-07-24 20:27 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-07-24 22:05 ` Rik van Riel
2001-07-24 20:53 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-07-24 22:27 ` Rik van Riel
2001-07-24 23:09 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-24 19:35 ` Rob Landley
2001-07-25 6:10 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-07-25 8:32 ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-07-25 12:53 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-25 16:05 ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-07-25 12:57 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-25 5:12 ` Andrew Morton
2001-07-25 6:33 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-07-30 18:09 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-07-24 22:41 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-24 22:22 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-25 2:31 ` Marcelo Tosatti
[not found] <010301c11463$1ee00440$294b82ce@connecttech.com>
2001-07-24 17:07 ` Rik van Riel
2001-07-24 17:42 ` Stuart MacDonald
2001-07-24 17:51 ` Rik van Riel
2001-07-24 18:09 ` Stuart MacDonald
2001-07-24 18:15 ` Mike Castle
2001-07-24 18:21 ` Rik van Riel
2001-07-24 17:44 ` Mike Castle
2001-07-24 17:52 ` Rik van Riel
[not found] <0107251802300B.00907@starship>
2001-07-25 16:41 ` Rik van Riel
2001-07-25 17:46 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-26 8:36 ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-07-26 12:06 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-26 10:38 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-07-26 12:17 ` Daniel Phillips
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-07-26 3:27 Ed Tomlinson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0107250218020A.00520@starship \
--to=phillips@bonn-fries.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patrick@dreker.de \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox