public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ben LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <mikeg@wen-online.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Optimization for use-once pages
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 19:46:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0107251946010C.00907@starship> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0107251340550.20326-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0107251340550.20326-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva>

On Wednesday 25 July 2001 18:41, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > On Wednesday 25 July 2001 08:33, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > Now I'm not sure why directly adding swapcache pages to the
> > > inactive dirty lits with 0 zero age improves things.
> >
> > Because it moves the page rapidly down the inactive queue towards
> > the ->writepage instead of leaving it floating around on the active
> > ring waiting to be noticed.  We already know we want to evict that
> > page,
>
> We don't.
>
> The page gets unmapped and added to the swap cache the first
> time it wasn't referenced by the process.
>
> This is before any page aging is done.

True, it's more accurate to say that we already know we want to *try* 
evicting that page.  A wrong guess should not make it all the way down 
the inactive queue.

--
Daniel

  reply	other threads:[~2001-07-25 17:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <0107251802300B.00907@starship>
2001-07-25 16:41 ` [RFC] Optimization for use-once pages Rik van Riel
2001-07-25 17:46   ` Daniel Phillips [this message]
2001-07-26  8:36   ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-07-26 12:06     ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-26 10:38       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-07-26 12:17         ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-26  3:27 Ed Tomlinson
     [not found] <010301c11463$1ee00440$294b82ce@connecttech.com>
2001-07-24 17:07 ` Rik van Riel
2001-07-24 17:42   ` Stuart MacDonald
2001-07-24 17:51     ` Rik van Riel
2001-07-24 18:09       ` Stuart MacDonald
2001-07-24 18:15       ` Mike Castle
2001-07-24 18:21         ` Rik van Riel
2001-07-24 17:44   ` Mike Castle
2001-07-24 17:52     ` Rik van Riel
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-07-24  3:47 Daniel Phillips
2001-07-24 12:38 ` jlnance
2001-07-24 16:56   ` Rik van Riel
2001-07-25  0:04     ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-25  0:43     ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-07-25  1:30       ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-25 21:18         ` Steve Lord
2001-07-24 16:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-24 17:04   ` Rik van Riel
2001-07-24 18:14     ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-24 18:15       ` Rik van Riel
2001-07-24 20:24   ` Patrick Dreker
2001-07-24 20:32     ` Rik van Riel
2001-07-24 22:16       ` Patrick Dreker
2001-07-24 22:25         ` Rik van Riel
2001-07-25  0:27           ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-25  8:20             ` Patrick Dreker
2001-07-25 12:57               ` Martin Devera
2001-07-25 14:16               ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-24 20:33     ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-25  1:25       ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-25  0:18     ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-24 20:27 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-07-24 22:05   ` Rik van Riel
2001-07-24 20:53     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-07-24 22:27       ` Rik van Riel
2001-07-24 23:09       ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-24 19:35         ` Rob Landley
2001-07-25  6:10           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-07-25  8:32           ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-07-25 12:53             ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-25 16:05               ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-07-25 12:57           ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-25  5:12       ` Andrew Morton
2001-07-25  6:33         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-07-30 18:09         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-07-24 22:41     ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-24 22:22   ` Daniel Phillips
2001-07-25  2:31 ` Marcelo Tosatti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0107251946010C.00907@starship \
    --to=phillips@bonn-fries.net \
    --cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
    --cc=bcrl@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
    --cc=mikeg@wen-online.de \
    --cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox