From: Roberto Arcomano <berto@fatamorgana.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proxy arp bug on shaper device
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 19:46:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01091819464200.01127@berto.casa.it> (raw)
Hello Julian,
when I decided to write the patch I had to solve following problem:
LINUX with shaper devices and proxy arp ---- WIN clients (which couldn't
start up).
I tried to solve problem with simple trick (like disable proxy arp or change
routing info), but I couldn't. Then, I realized that the problem was at
"kernel" level, cause I had:
host interface
HOST1 shaper0 (eth0)
So, when HOST1 started up, kernel (wrongly) sent it an ARP REPLY cause source
interface was different from destination interface (for the host). This is
really wrong, I think, cause shaper0 is the SAME interface (at physical
level, where proxy arp works) of eth0 (it uses same first 2 level ISO/OSI,
shaper has to be managed exactly as eth0).
In the end I say that I prefer kernel mode solution, rather than use mode
solution.
I Hope to has been clear.
Let me know what you think.
Regards
Roberto Arcomano
Il 15:24, martedì 18 settembre 2001, hai scritto:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Roberto Arcomano wrote:
> > Hello Julian,
> > thank you very much for your answer. I'm sure your solution would be ok,
> > but I think the right solution should be modify the kernel, cause, shaper
> > device cannot be managed like a physical device (I mean about route check
> > before sending ARP REPLY): I think it is more clear than other solutions.
>
> If this is true then you have to provide support for all
> other devices, for example, tunnels. The common for such setups is
> that asymmetric routing is used. OTOH, your change drops the ARP
> probe without updating the neighbour state. BTW, do you see any
> incoming traffic on the shaper device?
>
>
> Regards
>
> --
> Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
-------------------------------------------------------
next reply other threads:[~2001-09-18 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-18 17:46 Roberto Arcomano [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-09-18 17:46 [PATCH] proxy arp bug on shaper device Roberto Arcomano
2001-09-18 12:11 Julian Anastasov
2001-09-18 9:23 Roberto Arcomano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=01091819464200.01127@berto.casa.it \
--to=berto@fatamorgana.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox