From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 13:43:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 13:43:32 -0400 Received: from [213.82.86.194] ([213.82.86.194]:39439 "EHLO fatamorgana.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 13:43:15 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Roberto Arcomano To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] proxy arp bug on shaper device Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 19:46:58 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01091819465801.01127@berto.casa.it> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > If this is true then you have to provide support for all > other devices, for example, tunnels. Yes, unfortunately I tried but without success to extend patch to all that: I need some info to do it (particolary I cannot understand how extract "priv->dev" from a unknown device cause each (for each device) could be different.....) The common for such setups is > that asymmetric routing is used. OTOH, your change drops the ARP > probe without updating the neighbour state. BTW, do you see any > incoming traffic on the shaper device? There should not be incoming traffic from shaper device (I never saw it). Thank you for your help Roberto Arcomano > Regards > > -- > Julian Anastasov -------------------------------------------------------