From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 17:28:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 17:27:57 -0400 Received: from femail3.sdc1.sfba.home.com ([24.0.95.83]:7354 "EHLO femail3.sdc1.sfba.home.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 17:27:45 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Rob Landley Reply-To: landley@trommello.org Organization: Boundaries Unlimited To: Rik van Riel , Daniel Phillips Subject: Re: Linux VM design Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 13:27:38 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] Cc: VDA , Andrea Arcangeli , Alexander Viro , In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01092413273805.02280@localhost.localdomain> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 24 September 2001 15:32, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > To tell the truth, I don't really see why the frequency > > information is all that useful either. > > > > So the list of reasons why aging is good is looking really short. > > Ummmm, that _you_ can't see it doesn't mean suddenly all > VM research from the last 15 years has been invalidated. Out of morbid curiosity, how much of that research either said or assumed that microkernels were a good idea? Rob