From: Marvin Justice <mjustice@austin.rr.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: DMA problem (?) w/2.4.6-xfs and ServerWorks OSB4 Chipset
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 16:08:40 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01093016084007.00965@bozo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E15nnXL-0007aB-00@the-village.bc.nu>
In-Reply-To: <E15nnXL-0007aB-00@the-village.bc.nu>
Alright. Until the situation clarifies you might tell RH turn off OSB4 by
default in future releases. It caused us no end of grief with 2.4.3-12.
--
Marvin Justice
Software Developer
BOXX Technologies, Inc.
www.boxxtech.com
512-235-6318 (V)
512-835-0434 (F)
On Sunday 30 September 2001 03:50 pm, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Curious - OSB4 thinks the DMA is still running.
> > OSB4 wait exit
>
> This is an OSB4 trap for a problem I've seen with seagate drivers on some
> boxes. Under very high load with UDMA seagate drives the OSB4 returns to
> us with the chip reporting DMA in progress. The next I/O after this will
> cause disk corruption as it DMA's the last 4 bytes of the previous write,
> then the data shifted up by 4 bytes until the end of that I/O. I need
> to confirm nobody else is seeing this with other working workloads, then
> I'll swap it for a panic - better to die than kill the disc contents.
>
> Serverworks have been looking at the problem but have yet to duplicate it.
> As far as we can tell (and Red Hat have been working with a customer on
> this directly) your choices are
>
> 1. Use multiword DMA not UDMA
> 2. Use non seagate disks with that controller
>
> I am hopeful that serverworks will figure out what is up, but not every box
> sees it - and indeed they've yet to be able to reproduce it.
>
>
> Alan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-30 21:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-30 20:37 DMA problem (?) w/2.4.6-xfs and ServerWorks OSB4 Chipset Marvin Justice
2001-09-30 20:50 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-30 21:08 ` Marvin Justice [this message]
2001-09-30 21:45 ` Alan Cox
2001-10-01 15:04 ` Steven Timm
2001-10-01 15:10 ` Mark Hahn
2001-10-01 15:23 ` Steven Timm
2001-10-01 14:59 ` Steven Timm
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-10-12 20:31 DMA problem (?) w/2.4.6-xfs and Serverworks " Steven Timm
2001-10-12 21:12 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-27 21:34 DMA problem (?) w/2.4.6-xfs and ServerWorks " Steven Timm
2001-09-27 22:55 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-28 14:53 ` Steven Timm
2001-09-28 15:04 ` Alan Cox
2001-10-04 15:20 ` Benjamin S. Scarlet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=01093016084007.00965@bozo \
--to=mjustice@austin.rr.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox