public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Andrew Theurer" <habanero@us.ibm.com>
To: "Michael Hohnbaum" <hohnbaum@us.ibm.com>,
	<torvalds@transmeta.com>, <mingo@elte.hu>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Erich Focht" <efocht@ess.nec.de>,
	"Martin J. Bligh" <Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NUMA Scheduler - rev 4
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 20:21:40 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <010e01c2757b$920e8ed0$2a060e09@beavis> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1034807518.9367.910.camel@dyn9-47-17-164.beaverton.ibm.com

> Linus, Ingo,
>
> Attached is a small patch which provides NUMA awareness to the
> O(1) scheduler.  This patch retains the identical O(1) scheduler
> behavior for SMP systems.  For multi-node systems it favors
> runqueues on the current node when looking for another runqueue
> to pull tasks from.  It also makes a balance decision at exec().
> This patch is against 2.5.43.
>
> On NUMA systems these two changes have shown performance gains
> in the 5 - 10% range depending on tests.  Some micro-benchmarks
> provided by Erich Focht which stress the memory subsystem show
> a doubling in performance.
>
> Please consider applying this patch.

FYI, to make sure there was no degrade for non numa systems, I just benched
a kernel compile on an IBM 8500R, with/without your patch.  Compile times
were 38.880 (vanilla) and 38.818 (numa sched).

Andrew Theurer


      reply	other threads:[~2002-10-17  1:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-16 22:31 [PATCH] NUMA Scheduler - rev 4 Michael Hohnbaum
2002-10-17  1:21 ` Andrew Theurer [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='010e01c2757b$920e8ed0$2a060e09@beavis' \
    --to=habanero@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=efocht@ess.nec.de \
    --cc=hohnbaum@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox