From: Rolf Fokkens <fokkensr@linux06.vertis.nl>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: iptables and tcpdump
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 17:10:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01102817104101.01788@home01> (raw)
Hi!
I've been "tcpdumping" traffic that passes through a NAT box based on
netfilter. Everything works wonderful, but tcpdump presents confusing data.
With the help of google I found out that tcpdump sees the data right after
the NF_IP_PRE_ROUTING and the NF_IP_POST_ROUTING hooks. This explains it all,
but results in a new question: why does tcpdump "see" the data after the
NF_IP_PRE_ROUTING hook instead of before, which more accurately reflects the
data that's on the wire?
I can imagine this has been explained before, but I haven't found the full
explanation. Could someone enlighten me?
Another thing is /proc/net/ip_conntrack. It shows also some confusing
information like this:
icmp 1 29 src=145.66.17.200 dst=10.13.92.231 ... [UNREPLIED]
src=130.130.92.231 dst=145.66.17.200 ...
One half shows an unNATted dst, the second half shows the NATted src.
Logically speaking they should match but now they don't.
So everything works fine, but it's presented in a confusing way (tcpdump,
ip_conntrack). This may be intentionally but it seems a little accidentally
to me.
Rolf
-------------------------------------------------------
next reply other threads:[~2001-10-28 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-29 1:10 Rolf Fokkens [this message]
2001-10-30 4:28 ` iptables and tcpdump Rusty Russell
2001-10-30 5:31 ` David S. Miller
2001-10-31 5:45 ` Rolf Fokkens
2001-10-31 6:28 ` Rusty Russell
2001-10-31 13:34 ` kuznet
2001-11-06 23:40 ` David S. Miller
2001-10-30 17:31 ` kuznet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=01102817104101.01788@home01 \
--to=fokkensr@linux06.vertis.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox