From: vda <vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
To: Mathijs Mohlmann <mathijs@knoware.nl>, Jan Hudec <bulb@ucw.cz>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] Bad #define, nonportable C, missing {}
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 17:12:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01112117122701.02798@nemo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20011121145237.mathijs@knoware.nl>
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20011121145237.mathijs@knoware.nl>
On Wednesday 21 November 2001 13:52, Mathijs Mohlmann wrote:
> On 21-Nov-2001 Jan Hudec wrote:
> >> Go read up on C operator precedence. Unary ++ comes before %, so if we
> >> rewrite the #define to make it more "readable" it would be #define
> >> MODINC(x,y) (x = (x+1) % y)
> >
> > *NO*
> > MODINC(x,y) (x = (x+1) % y)
> > is correct and beaves as expected. Unfortunately:
> > MODINC(x,y) (x = x++ % y)
> > is a nonsence, because the evaluation is something like this
> > x++ returns x
> > x++ % y returns x % y
> > x is assigned the result and it's incremented IN UNDEFINED ORDER!!!
> > AFAIK the ANSI C spec explicitly undefines the order.
>
> in fact, gcc does (according to my tests):
> MODINC(x,y) (x = (x % y) + 1)
drivers/message/i2o/i2o_config.c:#define MODINC(x,y) (x = x++ % y)
Alan, can you clarify what this macro is doing?
What about making it less confusing?
--
vda
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-21 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-21 12:40 [BUG] Bad #define, nonportable C, missing {} vda
2001-11-21 11:10 ` Andreas Schwab
2001-11-21 11:16 ` Tim Waugh
2001-11-21 12:31 ` Ragnar Hojland Espinosa
2001-11-21 13:40 ` Jan Hudec
2001-11-21 14:19 ` Andreas Schwab
2001-11-21 14:52 ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-21 18:23 ` Neil Booth
2001-11-21 12:35 ` Vincent Sweeney
2001-11-21 13:37 ` Jan Hudec
2001-11-21 13:52 ` Mathijs Mohlmann
2001-11-21 17:12 ` vda [this message]
2001-11-26 20:28 ` Alan Cox
2001-11-27 18:03 ` vda
2001-11-27 18:38 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-11-28 13:19 ` vda
2001-11-21 14:12 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-11-21 14:33 ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-11-21 14:56 ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-21 14:59 ` Andreas Schwab
2001-11-21 15:48 ` Momchil Velikov
2001-11-21 16:52 ` vda
2001-11-21 14:24 ` Sean Hunter
2001-11-21 14:25 ` Andreas Schwab
2001-11-22 20:43 ` Chris Gray
2001-11-22 4:24 ` Stevie O
2001-11-22 11:46 ` Horst von Brand
2001-11-22 12:03 ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-22 20:08 ` J.A. Magallon
[not found] ` <01112311540300.00886@manta>
2001-11-23 14:43 ` J.A. Magallon
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-11-27 19:03 Nathan Myers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=01112117122701.02798@nemo \
--to=vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=bulb@ucw.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathijs@knoware.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox