public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: vda <vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
To: Mathijs Mohlmann <mathijs@knoware.nl>, Jan Hudec <bulb@ucw.cz>,
	Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] Bad #define, nonportable C, missing {}
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 17:12:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <01112117122701.02798@nemo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20011121145237.mathijs@knoware.nl>
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20011121145237.mathijs@knoware.nl>

On Wednesday 21 November 2001 13:52, Mathijs Mohlmann wrote:
> On 21-Nov-2001 Jan Hudec wrote:
> >> Go read up on C operator precedence. Unary ++ comes before %, so if we
> >> rewrite the #define to make it more "readable" it would be #define
> >> MODINC(x,y) (x = (x+1) % y)
> >
> > *NO*
> > MODINC(x,y) (x = (x+1) % y)
> > is correct and beaves as expected. Unfortunately:
> > MODINC(x,y) (x = x++ % y)
> > is a nonsence, because the evaluation is something like this
> > x++ returns x
> > x++ % y returns x % y
> > x is assigned the result and it's incremented IN UNDEFINED ORDER!!!
> > AFAIK the ANSI C spec explicitly undefines the order.
>
> in fact, gcc does (according to my tests):
> MODINC(x,y) (x = (x % y) + 1)

drivers/message/i2o/i2o_config.c:#define MODINC(x,y) (x = x++ % y)

Alan, can you clarify what this macro is doing?
What about making it less confusing?
--
vda

  reply	other threads:[~2001-11-21 15:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-11-21 12:40 [BUG] Bad #define, nonportable C, missing {} vda
2001-11-21 11:10 ` Andreas Schwab
2001-11-21 11:16 ` Tim Waugh
2001-11-21 12:31 ` Ragnar Hojland Espinosa
2001-11-21 13:40   ` Jan Hudec
2001-11-21 14:19     ` Andreas Schwab
2001-11-21 14:52       ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-21 18:23     ` Neil Booth
2001-11-21 12:35 ` Vincent Sweeney
2001-11-21 13:37   ` Jan Hudec
2001-11-21 13:52     ` Mathijs Mohlmann
2001-11-21 17:12       ` vda [this message]
2001-11-26 20:28         ` Alan Cox
2001-11-27 18:03           ` vda
2001-11-27 18:38             ` Andreas Dilger
2001-11-28 13:19               ` vda
2001-11-21 14:12     ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-11-21 14:33       ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-11-21 14:56       ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-21 14:59       ` Andreas Schwab
2001-11-21 15:48         ` Momchil Velikov
2001-11-21 16:52       ` vda
2001-11-21 14:24     ` Sean Hunter
2001-11-21 14:25   ` Andreas Schwab
2001-11-22 20:43   ` Chris Gray
2001-11-22  4:24 ` Stevie O
2001-11-22 11:46   ` Horst von Brand
2001-11-22 12:03     ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-22 20:08   ` J.A. Magallon
     [not found]     ` <01112311540300.00886@manta>
2001-11-23 14:43       ` J.A. Magallon
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-11-27 19:03 Nathan Myers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=01112117122701.02798@nemo \
    --to=vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=bulb@ucw.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathijs@knoware.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox