From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752154AbeC2Jfd (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Mar 2018 05:35:33 -0400 Received: from fllnx210.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.17]:42610 "EHLO fllnx210.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750884AbeC2Jfc (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Mar 2018 05:35:32 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/12] PCI: endpoint: BAR width should not depend on sizeof dma_addr_t To: Niklas Cassel , , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Bjorn Helgaas , Sekhar Nori , Shawn Lin , Niklas Cassel , John Keeping References: <20180328115018.31921-1-niklas.cassel@axis.com> <20180328115018.31921-2-niklas.cassel@axis.com> CC: , From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I Message-ID: <01244df4-165b-77bb-e542-26e33dc0d348@ti.com> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 15:05:03 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180328115018.31921-2-niklas.cassel@axis.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 28 March 2018 05:20 PM, Niklas Cassel wrote: > If a BAR supports 64-bit width or not depends on the hardware, > and should thus not depend on sizeof(dma_addr_t). > > If a certain hardware doesn't support 64-bit BARs, its > epc->ops->set_bar() implementation should return -EINVAL > when PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64 is set. > > We can't change pci_epc_set_bar() to only set > PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64 based on size, since if the user, > for some reason, wants to configure a BAR with a 64-bit width, > even though the BAR size is less than 4 GB, he should be able > to do that. > > However, since pci-epf-test is simply a test and not an API, > we can set PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64 in pci-epf-test itself > only based on size. > > Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel Acked-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I > --- > drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 12 +++++++----- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c > index 64d8a17f8094..f6c0c59b1bc8 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c > @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ struct pci_epf_test_data { > bool linkup_notifier; > }; > > -static int bar_size[] = { 512, 512, 1024, 16384, 131072, 1048576 }; > +static size_t bar_size[] = { 512, 512, 1024, 16384, 131072, 1048576 }; > > static int pci_epf_test_copy(struct pci_epf_test *epf_test) > { > @@ -367,12 +367,14 @@ static int pci_epf_test_set_bar(struct pci_epf *epf) > struct pci_epf_test *epf_test = epf_get_drvdata(epf); > enum pci_barno test_reg_bar = epf_test->test_reg_bar; > > - flags = PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_MEMORY | PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_32; > - if (sizeof(dma_addr_t) == 0x8) > - flags |= PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64; > - > for (bar = BAR_0; bar <= BAR_5; bar++) { > epf_bar = &epf->bar[bar]; > + > + flags = PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_MEMORY; > + flags |= upper_32_bits(epf_bar->size) ? > + PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64 : > + PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_32; > + > ret = pci_epc_set_bar(epc, epf->func_no, bar, > epf_bar->phys_addr, > epf_bar->size, flags); >