public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com>
To: "'Jaegeuk Kim'" <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH 5/8] f2fs: support data flush in checkpoint
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 10:33:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <013301d137aa$32cbcc80$98636580$@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151215215842.GA66113@jaegeuk.local>

Hi Jaegeuk,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk@kernel.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 5:59 AM
> To: Chao Yu
> Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] f2fs: support data flush in checkpoint
> 
> Hi Chao,
> 
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 01:33:18PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> > Previously, when finishing a checkpoint, we only keep consistency of all fs
> > meta info including meta inode, node inode, dentry page of directory inode,
> > so, after a sudden power cut, f2fs can recover from last checkpoint with
> > full directory structure.
> >
> > But during checkpoint, we didn't flush dirty pages of regular and symlink
> > inode, so such dirty datas still in memory will be lost in that moment of
> > power off.
> >
> > In order to reduce the chance of lost data, this patch tries to flush user
> > data before starting a checkpoint. So user's data written between two
> > checkpoint which may not be fsynced could be saved.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 11 +++++++++++
> >  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h       |  5 +++++
> >  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> > index f33c4d7..217571f 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> > @@ -849,6 +849,17 @@ static int block_operations(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >
> >  	blk_start_plug(&plug);
> >
> > +retry_flush_datas:
> > +	/* write all the dirty data pages */
> > +	if (get_pages(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_DATAS)) {
> > +		sync_dirty_inodes(sbi, FILE_INODE);
> > +		if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) {
> > +			err = -EIO;
> > +			goto out;
> > +		}
> > +		goto retry_flush_datas;
> > +	}
> > +
> 
> Please don't do like this; our checkpoint should be different from system sync.
> I don't want to increase the checkpoint latency at all even in f2fs_gc as well.

Alright.

Since flushing dirty data definitely increasing our latency of the interface,
so what I thought was that let user take responsibility for risk of potential
longer latency once user choose to mount with data_flush option.

Now, look into this implementation, it seems that adding flushing operation
into checkpoint looks advancing rashly, it spreads random potential long
latency everywhere.

> 
> I think that something like this would be better.

I will follow that currently. :)

> 
> In f2fs_balance_fs_bg(),
> 	if (!avaliable_free_memory() || ...) {
> 		if (test_opt(DATA_FLUSH))
> 			sync_dirty_inodes(FILE_INODE);
> 		f2fs_sync_fs();
> 	}
> 
> Please add its mount option with a disabled one first.

OK, I will do that.

> 
> >  retry_flush_dents:
> >  	f2fs_lock_all(sbi);
> >  	/* write all the dirty dentry pages */
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > index d8bef3c..2477b2f5 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > @@ -648,6 +648,7 @@ struct f2fs_sm_info {
> >  enum count_type {
> >  	F2FS_WRITEBACK,
> >  	F2FS_DIRTY_DENTS,
> > +	F2FS_DIRTY_DATAS,
> 
> This should be F2FS_DIRTY_DATA.
> 
> And, it'd better to merge this part into your previous patch:
>  "f2fs: record dirty status of regular/symlink inodes"
> 
> I'll do that, so please check it out later from dev-test.

Thanks for doing this, still I will resend the patches for the people
who wants to comment on them.

Thanks,

> 
> >  	F2FS_DIRTY_NODES,
> >  	F2FS_DIRTY_META,
> >  	F2FS_INMEM_PAGES,
> > @@ -1068,6 +1069,8 @@ static inline void inode_inc_dirty_pages(struct inode *inode)
> >  	atomic_inc(&F2FS_I(inode)->dirty_pages);
> >  	if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))
> >  		inc_page_count(F2FS_I_SB(inode), F2FS_DIRTY_DENTS);
> > +	else
> > +		inc_page_count(F2FS_I_SB(inode), F2FS_DIRTY_DATAS);
> 
> ditto.
> 
> >  }
> >
> >  static inline void dec_page_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int count_type)
> > @@ -1085,6 +1088,8 @@ static inline void inode_dec_dirty_pages(struct inode *inode)
> >
> >  	if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))
> >  		dec_page_count(F2FS_I_SB(inode), F2FS_DIRTY_DENTS);
> > +	else
> > +		dec_page_count(F2FS_I_SB(inode), F2FS_DIRTY_DATAS);
> 
> ditto.
> 
> >  }
> >
> >  static inline int get_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int count_type)
> > --
> > 2.6.3
> >


      reply	other threads:[~2015-12-16  2:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-15  5:33 [PATCH 5/8] f2fs: support data flush in checkpoint Chao Yu
2015-12-15 21:58 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-16  2:33   ` Chao Yu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='013301d137aa$32cbcc80$98636580$@samsung.com' \
    --to=chao2.yu@samsung.com \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox