From: "Dongseok Yi" <dseok.yi@samsung.com>
To: "'Willem de Bruijn'" <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: "'Yunsheng Lin'" <linyunsheng@huawei.com>,
"'Daniel Borkmann'" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"'bpf'" <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
"'Alexei Starovoitov'" <ast@kernel.org>,
"'Andrii Nakryiko'" <andrii@kernel.org>,
"'Martin KaFai Lau'" <kafai@fb.com>,
"'Song Liu'" <songliubraving@fb.com>,
"'Yonghong Song'" <yhs@fb.com>,
"'John Fastabend'" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
"'KP Singh'" <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
"'David S. Miller'" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"'Jakub Kicinski'" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"'Network Development'" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"'linux-kernel'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH bpf] bpf: check for data_len before upgrading mss when 6 to 4
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 10:11:08 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <015101d74602$86442210$92cc6630$@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+FuTSeyuUvKC==Mo7L+u3PS0BQyea+EdLLYjhGFrP7FQZsbEQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 09:46:25AM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 9:19 AM Willem de Bruijn
> <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > That generates TCP packets with different MSS within the same stream.
> > > >
> > > > My suggestion remains to just not change MSS at all. But this has to
> > > > be a new flag to avoid changing established behavior.
> > >
> > > I don't understand why the mss size should be kept in GSO step. Will
> > > there be any issue with different mss?
> >
> > This issue has come up before and that has been the feedback from
> > TCP experts at one point.
> >
> > > In general, upgrading mss make sense when 6 to 4. The new flag would be
> > > set by user to not change mss. What happened if user does not set the
> > > flag? I still think we should fix the issue with a general approach. Or
> > > can we remove the skb_increase_gso_size line?
> >
> > Admins that insert such BPF packets should be aware of these issues.
> > And likely be using clamping. This is a known issue.
> >
> > We arrived that the flag approach in bpf_skb_net_shrink. Extending
> > that to bpf_skb_change_proto would be consistent.
>
> As for more generic approach: does downgrading to non-TSO by clearing
> gso_size work for this edge case?
It can hit __skb_linearize in validate_xmit_skb and frags will be
copied to a linear part. The linear part size can exceed the MTU of
skb->dev unexpectedly.
I will make another patch with the flag approach.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-11 1:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20210429102143epcas2p4c8747c09a9de28f003c20389c050394a@epcas2p4.samsung.com>
2021-04-29 10:08 ` [PATCH bpf] bpf: check for data_len before upgrading mss when 6 to 4 Dongseok Yi
2021-05-05 20:55 ` Daniel Borkmann
2021-05-06 0:45 ` Dongseok Yi
2021-05-06 1:45 ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-05-06 2:27 ` Dongseok Yi
2021-05-06 18:21 ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-05-07 0:53 ` Dongseok Yi
2021-05-07 1:25 ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-05-07 1:45 ` Yunsheng Lin
2021-05-07 1:53 ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-05-07 8:25 ` Dongseok Yi
2021-05-07 9:11 ` Yunsheng Lin
2021-05-07 10:36 ` Dongseok Yi
2021-05-07 13:50 ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-05-10 2:22 ` Dongseok Yi
2021-05-10 13:19 ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-05-10 13:46 ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-05-11 1:11 ` Dongseok Yi [this message]
2021-05-11 17:38 ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-05-12 0:45 ` Dongseok Yi
2021-05-11 6:36 ` [PATCH bpf v2] bpf: check BPF_F_ADJ_ROOM_FIXED_GSO when upgrading mss in " Dongseok Yi
2021-05-11 17:42 ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-05-12 6:56 ` Dongseok Yi
2021-05-12 7:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3] bpf: check for BPF_F_ADJ_ROOM_FIXED_GSO when bpf_skb_change_proto Dongseok Yi
2021-05-12 14:13 ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-05-18 20:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='015101d74602$86442210$92cc6630$@samsung.com' \
--to=dseok.yi@samsung.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linyunsheng@huawei.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox