From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 18 Aug 2001 10:51:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 18 Aug 2001 10:51:46 -0400 Received: from mail.fbab.net ([212.75.83.8]:36625 "HELO mail.fbab.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 18 Aug 2001 10:51:34 -0400 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: mag@fbab.net via mail.fbab.net X-Qmail-Scanner-Rcpt-To: riel@conectiva.com.br linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Qmail-Scanner: 0.94 (No viruses found. Processed in 8.153163 secs) Message-ID: <015d01c127f5$93ec9230$020a0a0a@totalmef> From: "Magnus Naeslund\(f\)" To: "Rik van Riel" Cc: "linux-kernel" In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: 2.4.8 Resource leaks + limits Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 16:53:44 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "Rik van Riel" [snip] > > Morale of the story: whenever you find a bug, try if you > can reproduce it with Alan's kernel ;) > Ok, i got it. I tried with 2.4.8ac5 and it seems to hold nicely. Too bad this isn't so much documented. The whole pam_limit thing is pretty poorly detailed. Like the prio limit, it doesn't say what ranges and so on. (well it's the same as nice, but it doesnt say that eihter i think :)) > Rik > Magnus -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Programmer/Networker [|] Magnus Naeslund PGP Key: http://www.genline.nu/mag_pgp.txt -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-