From: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
To: Yao Kai <yaokai34@huawei.com>, <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
<tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>, <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>,
<jack@suse.cz>, <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>, <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <yi.zhang@huawei.com>,
<liuyongqiang13@huawei.com>,
<syzbot+5322c5c260eb44d209ed@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: validate readdir offset before accessing dirent
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2026 12:31:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0161d800-e6fd-953d-9fc9-5df5db3dbed0@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260703015106.3570064-1-yaokai34@huawei.com>
在 2026/7/3 9:51, Yao Kai 写道:
> A corrupted directory can trigger the following KASAN report when
> ext4_readdir() resumes from an invalid position:
>
> BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x5ef/0x820
> Read of size 2 at addr ffff88810a646000 by task repro_linear/509
>
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> dump_stack_lvl+0x53/0x70
> print_report+0xd0/0x630
> kasan_report+0xce/0x100
> __ext4_check_dir_entry+0x5ef/0x820
> ext4_readdir+0xcde/0x2b70
> iterate_dir+0x1a1/0x520
> __x64_sys_getdents64+0x12b/0x220
> do_syscall_64+0xf9/0x540
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
> </TASK>
>
> KASAN reports use-after-free because the out-of-bounds access lands in an
> adjacent freed page. The directory buffer itself is still referenced.
>
> ext4_dir_llseek() invalidates the directory cookie so that ext4_readdir()
> rescans directory entries from the start of the block. The rescan checks
> only the lower bound of rec_len before advancing. A corrupted rec_len can
> therefore place the offset where the block has insufficient space for a
> complete directory entry. The rescan itself may dereference that truncated
> entry, or the main loop may pass it to __ext4_check_dir_entry(). The latter
> reads de->rec_len before validating the range. For example:
>
> block offset 0 4092 4096
> |---- de1.rec_len = 4092 -----|----|
> de2.inode
> | de2.rec_len
> ^ OOB, reported as UAF
>
> de2 starts at offset 4092 in this 4 KiB block. Its four-byte inode fits in
> the block, but its rec_len starts at offset 4096 and crosses the boundary.
>
> The minimum safe length is inode-dependent. Encrypted and casefolded
> directory entries need eight additional hash bytes, while a valid metadata
> checksum tail is only 12 bytes.
>
> Cache the metadata checksum feature state and derive the minimum directory
> entry length from the on-disk format. Use it to bound both the rescan and
> the offset passed to the main loop. Report an offset in a truncated block
> tail and skip the remainder of the block, while continuing to accept an
> offset exactly at the block boundary.
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+5322c5c260eb44d209ed@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=5322c5c260eb44d209ed
> Fixes: ac27a0ec112a ("[PATCH] ext4: initial copy of files from ext3")
> Signed-off-by: Yao Kai <yaokai34@huawei.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/dir.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/dir.c b/fs/ext4/dir.c
> index 17edd678fa87..5c943d18882a 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/dir.c
> @@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ static int ext4_readdir(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx)
> struct buffer_head *bh = NULL;
> struct fscrypt_str fstr = FSTR_INIT(NULL, 0);
> struct dir_private_info *info = file->private_data;
> + bool has_csum = ext4_has_feature_metadata_csum(sb);
>
> err = fscrypt_prepare_readdir(inode);
> if (err)
> @@ -149,7 +150,7 @@ static int ext4_readdir(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx)
> return err;
>
> /* Can we just clear INDEX flag to ignore htree information? */
> - if (!ext4_has_feature_metadata_csum(sb)) {
> + if (!has_csum) {
> /*
> * We don't set the inode dirty flag since it's not
> * critical that it gets flushed back to the disk.
> @@ -235,7 +236,10 @@ static int ext4_readdir(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx)
> * dirent right now. Scan from the start of the block
> * to make sure. */
> if (!inode_eq_iversion(inode, info->cookie)) {
> - for (i = 0; i < sb->s_blocksize && i < offset; ) {
> + for (i = 0;
> + i <= sb->s_blocksize -
> + ext4_dir_rec_len(1, has_csum ? NULL : inode) &&
> + i < offset;) {
> de = (struct ext4_dir_entry_2 *)
> (bh->b_data + i);
> /* It's too expensive to do a full
> @@ -257,6 +261,17 @@ static int ext4_readdir(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx)
> info->cookie = inode_query_iversion(inode);
> }
>
> + if (unlikely(offset < sb->s_blocksize &&
> + offset > sb->s_blocksize -
> + ext4_dir_rec_len(1, has_csum ? NULL : inode))) {
> + EXT4_ERROR_FILE(file, bh->b_blocknr,
> + "bad entry in directory: %s - offset=%u, size=%lu",
> + "directory entry too close to block end",
> + offset, sb->s_blocksize);
> + ctx->pos = (ctx->pos | (sb->s_blocksize - 1)) + 1;
> + goto next_block;
> + }
> +
> while (ctx->pos < inode->i_size
> && offset < sb->s_blocksize) {
> de = (struct ext4_dir_entry_2 *) (bh->b_data + offset);
> @@ -312,6 +327,7 @@ static int ext4_readdir(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx)
> ctx->pos += ext4_rec_len_from_disk(de->rec_len,
> sb->s_blocksize);
> }
> +next_block:
> if ((ctx->pos < inode->i_size) && !dir_relax_shared(inode))
> goto done;
> brelse(bh);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-03 4:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-03 1:51 [PATCH] ext4: validate readdir offset before accessing dirent Yao Kai
2026-07-03 4:31 ` Zhihao Cheng [this message]
2026-07-03 15:43 ` Jan Kara
2026-07-04 2:41 ` Zhang Yi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0161d800-e6fd-953d-9fc9-5df5db3dbed0@huawei.com \
--to=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=libaokun@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuyongqiang13@huawei.com \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=syzbot+5322c5c260eb44d209ed@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yaokai34@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox