From: "JaniD++" <djani22@dynamicweb.hu>
To: "Nate Diller" <nate.diller@gmail.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: buffer cache question
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:26:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <016701c60c94$a3a599f0$a400a8c0@dcccs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 5c49b0ed0512282010x156d59afmb2e1dd420542440b@mail.gmail.com
Hi,
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nate Diller" <nate.diller@gmail.com>
To: "JaniD++" <djani22@dynamicweb.hu>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; <pavel@suse.cz>
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 5:10 AM
Subject: Re: buffer cache question
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Nate Diller
> > To: JaniD++
> > Cc: Roger Heflin ; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > Sent: Friday, December 23, 2005 9:58 AM
> > Subject: Re: buffer cache question
> >
> > looks like you're barely using any of your high memory. maybe NBD
doesn't
> > have highmem support. what file system are you using?
> >
> > NATE
> >
> >
> > I cannot understant this.
> > NBD need to support highmem for buffering?
> > If know right, the kernel does buffering, not NBD!
> > But the kernel only use ~830MB for buffer cache instead of dinamically
use
> > all free memory like page cache.
> >
> > This is one raw disk node, independent from file system.
> >
>
> this is an NBD client, using CONFIG_BLK_DEV_NBD? on the 2.6 series
> kernel? if so, then it, like any other kernel component using the
> page cache, needs to explicity use kmap/kunmap to make use of memory
> in the high memory zone. on a 32 bit machine, any pages above the 896
> meg mark are treated specially inside the linux kernel (see
> http://kerneltrap.org/node/2450).
Yes, i have read this helpful document, but there is about the memory usage,
mapping, and not exactly the buffering/caching.
Yes, i use the 2.6 series NBD.
>
> if you don't have highmem support (CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G) enabled, then
> enabling that should fix it. if you already have it enabled (it
> looked like it to me, based on your /proc/meminfo) then there is a bug
> somewhere.
Yes, it is enabled.
>
> it would seem from a brief inspection that the send/recv_bvec
> functions in nbd (2.6.13) do use kmap. I don't know the nbd code very
> well, it seems that Pavel Machek wrote the code, he or block layer
> maintainer Jens Axboe may know something I don't. So if enabling
> highmem in your .config doesn't help, try CC'ing them with your issue.
> in the mean time, one of the memory split patches, such as the 4G:4G
> patch, should get things working.
The NBD use buffer cache (i am sure), but the highest limit is about
830-840M.
Where can i get the split patch?
Thanks for helpful answers!
Cheers,
Janos
>
> NATE
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-29 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-18 21:09 buffer cache question JaniD++
2005-12-19 18:15 ` Roger Heflin
2005-11-22 0:41 ` JaniD++
[not found] ` <5c49b0ed0512230058q157ddedx96059d876c45a69f@mail.gmail.com>
2005-12-23 21:50 ` JaniD++
2005-12-29 4:10 ` Nate Diller
2005-12-29 16:26 ` JaniD++ [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='016701c60c94$a3a599f0$a400a8c0@dcccs' \
--to=djani22@dynamicweb.hu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nate.diller@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox