From: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
To: Kriish Sharma <kriish.sharma2006@gmail.com>,
Prathosh Satish <Prathosh.Satish@microchip.com>,
Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>,
Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dpll: zl3073x: fix kernel-doc name and missing parameter in fw.c
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 18:09:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <018e3129-e367-4637-8892-7eb83dcae40f@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251112055642.2597450-1-kriish.sharma2006@gmail.com>
On 11/12/25 6:56 AM, Kriish Sharma wrote:
> Documentation build reported:
>
> Warning: drivers/dpll/zl3073x/fw.c:365 function parameter 'comp' not described in 'zl3073x_fw_component_flash'
> Warning: drivers/dpll/zl3073x/fw.c:365 expecting prototype for zl3073x_flash_bundle_flash(). Prototype was for zl3073x_fw_component_flash() instead
> Warning: drivers/dpll/zl3073x/fw.c:365 No description found for return value of 'zl3073x_fw_component_flash'
>
> The kernel-doc comment above `zl3073x_fw_component_flash()` used the wrong
> function name (`zl3073x_flash_bundle_flash`) and omitted the `@comp` parameter.
> This patch updates the comment to correctly document the
> `zl3073x_fw_component_flash()` function and its arguments.
>
> Fixes: ca017409da69 ("dpll: zl3073x: Add firmware loading functionality")
> Signed-off-by: Kriish Sharma <kriish.sharma2006@gmail.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - Added colon to fix kernel-doc warning for `Return:` line.
>
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251110195030.2248235-1-kriish.sharma2006@gmail.com
>
> drivers/dpll/zl3073x/fw.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dpll/zl3073x/fw.c b/drivers/dpll/zl3073x/fw.c
> index def37fe8d9b0..55b638247f4b 100644
> --- a/drivers/dpll/zl3073x/fw.c
> +++ b/drivers/dpll/zl3073x/fw.c
> @@ -352,12 +352,12 @@ struct zl3073x_fw *zl3073x_fw_load(struct zl3073x_dev *zldev, const char *data,
> }
>
> /**
> - * zl3073x_flash_bundle_flash - Flash all components
> + * zl3073x_fw_component_flash - Flash all components
> * @zldev: zl3073x device structure
> - * @components: pointer to components array
> + * @comp: pointer to components array
> * @extack: netlink extack pointer to report errors
> *
> - * Returns 0 in case of success or negative number otherwise.
> + * Return: 0 in case of success or negative number otherwise.
> */
Reviewed-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-13 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-12 5:56 [PATCH v2] dpll: zl3073x: fix kernel-doc name and missing parameter in fw.c Kriish Sharma
2025-11-13 17:09 ` Ivan Vecera [this message]
2025-11-14 1:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=018e3129-e367-4637-8892-7eb83dcae40f@redhat.com \
--to=ivecera@redhat.com \
--cc=Prathosh.Satish@microchip.com \
--cc=arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kriish.sharma2006@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).