From: "Hua Zhong" <hzhong@cisco.com>
To: "'Linus Torvalds'" <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: "'Christoph Hellwig'" <hch@infradead.org>,
"'P. Benie'" <pjb1008@eng.cam.ac.uk>,
"'Kernel Mailing List'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] [2.5] Non-blocking write can block
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 11:44:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01b601c32ac9$52f002c0$ca41cb3f@amer.cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0306041019570.14465-100000@home.transmeta.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Linus Torvalds [mailto:torvalds@transmeta.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:42 AM
> To: Hua Zhong
> Cc: 'Christoph Hellwig'; 'P. Benie'; 'Kernel Mailing List'
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] [2.5] Non-blocking write can block
>
>
>
> On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Hua Zhong wrote:
> >
> > We ran into this problem here in an embedded environment. It causes
> > syslogd to hang and when this happens, everybody who talks to
syslogd
> > hangs. Which means you may not even be able to login. In the end we
> > used exactly the same fix which seems to work.
> >
> > I am curious to know the correct fix.
>
> [ First off: your embedded syslog problem is fixed by making sure that
> syslog doesn't try to write to a tty that somebody else might be
> blocked. In other words, to me it sounds like a "well, don't do that
> then" schenario, rather than a real kernel problem. ]
It's hard. The shell might be printing and you cannot prevent that.
That said, the main problem was somebody could be stuck in waiting for
tty *forever* and thus everyone who tries to write also hangs.
This particular patch is in 2.4.20 already. There is another patch in
2.4.20 (?) which seems to fix the "main problem" (the n_tty_write_wakeup
function in n_tty.c), but I didn't verify it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-04 18:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-04 0:58 [PATCH] [2.5] Non-blocking write can block P. Benie
2003-06-04 5:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-06-04 14:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-06-04 14:58 ` P. Benie
2003-06-04 16:47 ` Alan Cox
2003-06-04 17:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-06-04 19:46 ` P. Benie
2003-06-04 19:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-06-04 20:48 ` P. Benie
2003-06-11 0:19 ` Robert White
2003-06-04 20:43 ` Hua Zhong
2003-06-04 23:42 ` Russell King
2003-06-04 23:47 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-06-04 21:29 ` Alan Cox
2003-06-04 17:14 ` Hua Zhong
2003-06-04 17:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-06-04 18:44 ` Hua Zhong [this message]
2003-06-04 18:47 ` P. Benie
2003-06-04 19:23 ` P. Benie
2003-06-04 19:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-06-04 17:53 ` Mike Dresser
2003-06-04 15:21 ` Coding standards. (Was: Re: [PATCH] [2.5] Non-blocking write can block) Timothy Miller
2003-06-07 0:12 ` Greg KH
2003-06-07 0:59 ` Alex Goddard
2003-06-09 16:24 ` Timothy Miller
2003-06-09 16:39 ` Jörn Engel
2003-06-09 17:15 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-06-09 17:33 ` Eli Carter
2003-06-09 17:49 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-06-09 18:07 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-06-09 18:22 ` Jörn Engel
2003-06-09 18:55 ` Timothy Miller
2003-06-09 18:58 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-06-09 21:35 ` David Schwartz
2003-06-09 22:55 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-06-09 23:21 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-06-09 21:54 ` Jörn Engel
2003-06-10 18:17 ` Jesse Pollard
2003-06-10 18:41 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-06-10 18:14 ` Jesse Pollard
2003-06-09 23:50 ` James Stevenson
2003-06-09 18:44 ` Timothy Miller
2003-06-09 22:00 ` Jörn Engel
[not found] <20030604172026$296c@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <20030604175013$3a4d@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-06-04 19:13 ` [PATCH] [2.5] Non-blocking write can block Ben Pfaff
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-06-04 19:36 Hua Zhong
2003-06-04 20:09 ` Hua Zhong
2003-06-05 0:04 Ed Vance
2003-06-05 0:19 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-06-05 18:34 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-06-05 19:15 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-06-05 21:46 ` Joe Korty
2003-06-06 0:13 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-06-06 12:13 Nicholas Berry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='01b601c32ac9$52f002c0$ca41cb3f@amer.cisco.com' \
--to=hzhong@cisco.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pjb1008@eng.cam.ac.uk \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox