From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 3 Aug 2001 11:41:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 3 Aug 2001 11:41:20 -0400 Received: from isimail.interactivesi.com ([207.8.4.3]:45836 "HELO dinero.interactivesi.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 3 Aug 2001 11:41:09 -0400 Message-ID: <01ca01c11c33$247cc0f0$bef7020a@mammon> From: "Jeremy Linton" To: "Szabolcs Szakacsits" Cc: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: Ongoing 2.4 VM suckage pagemap_lru_lock Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2001 10:44:06 -0500 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Yes, I have 2.4.4 as well as 2.4.7pre6 on the box. That stack dump was generated from a 2.4.4 kernel. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Szabolcs Szakacsits" To: "Jeremy Linton" Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 8:01 PM Subject: Re: Ongoing 2.4 VM suckage pagemap_lru_lock > > On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, Jeremy Linton wrote: > > > #0 reclaim_page (zone=0xc0285ae8) at > > /usr/src/linux.2.4.4/include/asm/spinlock.h:102 > > Are you using 2.4.4? This is an old issue, the relevant codes changed > significantly .... > > Szaka > >