Re: RFD: Kernel release numbering

Jeff Garzik
2005-03-04T20:11:49Z

Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 11:12:22AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>Let's try with the 2.6.x.y numbering scheme, it's simple, and maybe it
>>ends up being sufficient. I just wanted to bring up the point that I don't
>>think the sucker tree _has_ to be seen as a 2.6.x.y tree at all.
>
>
> Fair enough, I'll stick with 2.6.x.y, as I think it's a good
> representation of what people expect. If people start objecting, I'm
> always open for change.

So far, 2.6.11.1 was what I was hoping, and expecting, it would be.

Jeff