Re: RFD: Kernel release numbering

Jeff Garzik
2005-03-03T22:36:22Z

On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 10:15:46PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> We still need 2.6.x.y updates on a more official footing and with more
> than one person as the "2.6.x.y" maintainer. I think that is actually
> more important.

That appears to be the consensus conclusion we've arrived at.

Jeff