From: "Roberto Slepetys Ferreira" <slepetys@homeworks.com.br>
To: "Jim Gifford" <jim@jg555.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Probably 2.4 kernel or AIC7xxx module trouble
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 17:15:51 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01f101c3419f$e6d30360$3300a8c0@Slepetys> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 13e101c3419d$f62f9410$3400a8c0@W2RZ8L4S02
Hi Jim,
It's exacly the same problem, after about 12-24 hour everything locks up,
but I can still ping (sometimes).
But the syslog stops, and I only reboot by hardware, because the CTL+ALT+DEL
doesn't works, and the terminal either.
It's a SMP (dual pentium III) too, but after some tests with single CPU and
NOAPIC parameter to the kernel, the trouble continues.
I have no clue for what kind of tests I can do to generate the trouble, or
for what logs, or files to look for.
[]s
Slepetys
> Roberto,
> How does this problem manifest itself. I think it's the same problem
> that I'm having. Let me know what you think. I'm using the megaraid driver
> and aic7xxx driver. After about a 12-20 hour period, everything locks up,
> but there is not error message. The kernel sysreq information does work
and
> I'm able to reboot.
>
> top - 12:59:05 up 3:02, 2 users, load average: 4.17, 4.35, 4.38
> Tasks: 122 total, 5 running, 117 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
> Cpu0 : 25.0% user, 50.0% system, 25.0% nice, 0.0% idle
> Cpu1 : 62.5% user, 31.2% system, 0.0% nice, 6.2% idle
> Mem: 1033896k total, 823636k used, 210260k free, 160412k buffers
> Swap: 1060280k total, 0k used, 1060280k free, 352848k cached
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Roberto Slepetys Ferreira" <slepetys@homeworks.com.br>
> To: "Roberto Slepetys Ferreira" <slepetys@homeworks.com.br>; "Justin T.
> Gibbs" <gibbs@scsiguy.com>; <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 11:29 AM
> Subject: Re: Probably 2.4 kernel or AIC7xxx module trouble
>
>
> > Ops....
> > The linux box halted again, after 12 hours operating normaly.
> >
> > The more strange is that there isn't any message in the
/var/log/message,
> > the system simples stop to respond, and some strange behavior is that
the
> > TOP comand gaves me :
> >
> > 15:10:15 up 33 min, 1 user, load average: 1.06, 1.17, 1.14
> > 91 processes: 90 sleeping, 1 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
> > CPU0 states: 0.0% user 3.1% system 0.0% nice 0.0% iowait 96.2%
> > idle
> > CPU1 states: 0.0% user 0.1% system 0.0% nice 0.0% iowait 99.2%
> > idle
> > Mem: 513172k av, 437740k used, 75432k free, 0k shrd, 17500k
> > buff
> > 258436k actv, 41792k in_d, 76644k in_c
> > Swap: 1060088k av, 44k used, 1060044k free 339860k
> > cached
> >
> > PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME CPU
COMMAND
> > 9 root 16 0 0 0 0 SW 0.8 0.0 0:02 0
> > kscand/Normal
> > 31 root 15 0 0 0 0 DW 0.5 0.0 0:05 0
> raid1syncd
> > 2425 root 15 0 1088 1088 864 R 0.2 0.2 0:00 1 top
> > 1 root 15 0 396 396 344 S 0.0 0.0 0:03 1 init
> > 2 root RT 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 0
> > migration/0
> > ... others...
> >
> > Meanning that the Load Average is incompatible with the use of the CPUs.
> >
> > I really have no idea where to find some clue about what is going on.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Roberto Slepetys
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Roberto Slepetys Ferreira" <slepetys@homeworks.com.br>
> > To: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@scsiguy.com>;
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 6:00 PM
> > Subject: Re: Probably 2.4 kernel or AIC7xxx module trouble
> >
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I upgraded it for the 6.2.36, using RPM and I am making some heavy
> tests.
> > >
> > > Until now, it's ok, and for this kind of tests, the old configuration
> gave
> > > some trouble.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Slepetys
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@scsiguy.com>
> > > To: "Roberto Slepetys Ferreira" <slepetys@homeworks.com.br>;
> > > <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 12:14 PM
> > > Subject: Re: Probably 2.4 kernel or AIC7xxx module trouble
> > >
> > >
> > > > > The system halts easily if I do a large I/O, like reindexing a
> > database,
> > > > > giving me some messages like: (scsi0:A:1:0): Locking max tag count
> at
> > > 128...
> > > >
> > > > The "Locking max tag count" messages are normal. It means the SCSI
> > > > driver was able to determine the maximum queue depth of your drive.
> > > >
> > > > 6.2.8 is rather old. I don't know that upgrading the aic7xxx driver
> > > > will solve your problem, but it might be worth a shot. The latest
> > > > is available here:
> > > >
> > > > http://people.FreeBSD.org/~gibbs/linux/SRC/
> > > >
> > > > After upgrading, you should be at 6.2.36.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Justin
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-03 19:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-02 14:44 Probably 2.4 kernel or AIC7xxx module trouble Roberto Slepetys Ferreira
2003-07-02 15:14 ` Justin T. Gibbs
2003-07-02 21:00 ` Roberto Slepetys Ferreira
2003-07-03 18:29 ` Roberto Slepetys Ferreira
[not found] ` <13e101c3419d$f62f9410$3400a8c0@W2RZ8L4S02>
2003-07-03 20:15 ` Roberto Slepetys Ferreira [this message]
2003-07-03 21:20 ` Justin T. Gibbs
2003-07-03 23:04 ` Jim Gifford
2003-07-05 20:15 ` Justin T. Gibbs
2003-07-05 20:28 ` Jim Gifford
2003-07-03 22:49 ` Matthias Andree
2003-07-03 23:09 ` Jim Gifford
[not found] <4R5X.8bo.19@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4Rzh.h8.25@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4WSg.5H7.21@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5h0y.5ht.25@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5iIR.7Cp.11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5iIQ.7Cp.9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5jOA.14o.9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5lnu.2l7.13@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-07-04 17:36 ` Roberto Slepetys Ferreira
2003-07-05 20:27 ` Justin T. Gibbs
[not found] ` <5ldB.2cK.1@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-07-04 17:38 ` Roberto Slepetys Ferreira
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='01f101c3419f$e6d30360$3300a8c0@Slepetys' \
--to=slepetys@homeworks.com.br \
--cc=jim@jg555.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox