public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mike Black" <mblack@csihq.com>
To: <tridge@valinux.com>, <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <riel@conectiva.com.br>,
	"Andrew Morton" <andrewm@uow.edu.au>
Subject: Re: 2.4.8preX VM problems
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2001 07:51:09 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <020001c11a80$43297110$e1de11cc@csihq.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0108010504160.9379-100000@freak.distro.conectiva> <20010801105419.8F078424A@lists.samba.org>

This sounds a lot like the problem I've been having with ext3 and raid.
A one-thread tiobench performs just great.
A two-thread tiobench starts having lots of kswapd action when free memory
gets down to ~5Meg.  ext3 exacerbates the problem.
kswapd kicks up it's heals and starts grinding away (and NEVER swaps
anything out).

I've been working this with Andrew Morton (the ext3 guy).

I have come to the opinion that kswapd needs to be a little smarter -- if it
doesn't find anything to swap shouldn't it go to sleep a little longer
before trying again?  That way it could gracefully degrade itself when it's
not making any progress.

In my testing (on a dual 1Ghz/2G machine) the machine "locks up" for long
periods of time while kswapd runs around trying to do it's thing.
If I could disable kswapd I would just to test this.
I tried to figure out how to lengthen the sleep time of kswapd but didn't
have time to chase it down (it wasn't intuitively obvious :-)

________________________________________
Michael D. Black   Principal Engineer
mblack@csihq.com  321-676-2923,x203
http://www.csihq.com  Computer Science Innovations
http://www.csihq.com/~mike  My home page
FAX 321-676-2355
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Tridgell" <tridge@valinux.com>
To: <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 6:54 AM
Subject: Re: 2.4.8preX VM problems


Marcelo,

> The following patch sets the zone free target to freepages.high. Can you
> test it ? (I tried here and got the expected results)

Running just that patch against 2.4.8pre3 gives:

[root@fraud /root]# ~/readfiles /dev/ddisk
198 MB    198.084 MB/sec
386 MB    188.634 MB/sec
570 MB    183.827 MB/sec
743 MB    172.5 MB/sec
810 MB    67.0501 MB/sec
862 MB    52.1381 MB/sec
901 MB    37.9501 MB/sec
957 MB    55.8253 MB/sec
998 MB    41.1541 MB/sec
1046 MB    48.1661 MB/sec
1088 MB    40.3898 MB/sec
1140 MB    50.8782 MB/sec
1183 MB    42.5749 MB/sec
1229 MB    46.1378 MB/sec
1275 MB    44.8515 MB/sec
1319 MB    43.5389 MB/sec
1368 MB    47.5747 MB/sec
1411 MB    42.8134 MB/sec


which is much better, but is pretty poor performance for a null
device.

Running with that latest patch plus the patch you sent previously
gives roughly the same result. Also, kswapd chews lots of cpu during
these runs:

CPU0 states:  0.0% user, 79.0% system,  0.0% nice, 20.4% idle
CPU1 states:  0.2% user, 77.1% system,  0.0% nice, 22.1% idle
Mem:  2059088K av,  892256K used, 1166832K free,       0K shrd,  784972K
buff
Swap: 1052216K av,       0K used, 1052216K free                   10072K
cached

  PID USER     PRI  NI  SIZE  RSS SHARE LC STAT %CPU %MEM   TIME COMMAND
  608 root      19   0   452  452   328  1 R    95.2  0.0   1:23 readfiles
    5 root      14   0     0    0     0  1 SW   58.3  0.0   0:52 kswapd
    6 root       9   0     0    0     0  1 RW    2.1  0.0   0:01 kreclaimd

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


  reply	other threads:[~2001-08-01 11:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-08-01  3:05 2.4.8preX VM problems Andrew Tridgell
2001-08-01  2:26 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-08-01  4:37   ` Andrew Tridgell
2001-08-01  3:32     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-08-01  5:43       ` Andrew Tridgell
2001-08-01  6:09   ` Andrew Tridgell
2001-08-01  6:10     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-08-01  8:13       ` Andrew Tridgell
2001-08-01  8:13         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-08-01 10:54           ` Andrew Tridgell
2001-08-01 11:51             ` Mike Black [this message]
2001-08-01 18:39               ` Daniel Phillips
2001-08-11 12:06                 ` Pavel Machek
2001-08-16 21:57                   ` Daniel Phillips
2001-08-04  6:50           ` Anton Blanchard
2001-08-04  5:55             ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-08-04 17:17               ` Anton Blanchard
2001-08-06 22:58                 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-08-07 17:18                   ` Anton Blanchard
2001-08-07 21:02                     ` Kernel 2.4.6 & 2.4.7 networking performance: seeing serious delays in TCP layer depending upon packet length Ron Flory

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='020001c11a80$43297110$e1de11cc@csihq.com' \
    --to=mblack@csihq.com \
    --cc=andrewm@uow.edu.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
    --cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
    --cc=tridge@valinux.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox