From: "Ivan G." <ivangurdiev@linuxfreemail.com>
To: "'Roger Luethi'" <rl@hellgate.ch>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] #2 VIA Rhine stalls: TxAbort handling
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 17:13:33 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <02051717133300.00656@cobra.linux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <369B0912E1F5D511ACA5003048222B75A3C06E@EXCHANGE2> <20020518040143.GA9318@k3.hellgate.ch>
> [1] "aborted due to excessive collisions" according to the doc, but it also
> mentions that for "excessive collisions", bit 13 would have to be set.
> It isn't.
> (I have seen it on my VT6102, though, with interrupt status of 0x2008
> for instance)
bit 13 = IntrTxAborted
I don't see it below.
/* Enable interrupts by setting the interrupt mask. */
writew(IntrRxDone | IntrRxErr | IntrRxEmpty| IntrRxOverflow| IntrRxDropped|
IntrTxDone | IntrTxAbort | IntrTxUnderrun | IntrPCIErr | IntrStatsMax |
IntrLinkChange | IntrMIIChange, ioaddr + IntrEnable);
Interrupts referenced in the driver and not listed here are: IntrRxNoBuf,
IntrRxWakeUp, IntrTxAborted
Interrupts included here but not used in the driver are:
IntrRxOverflow, IntrRxDropped.
I've known about this for a while but I wasn't sure how to fix everything...
I wasn't sure if every interrupt was handled correctly.
For example what exactly is the difference between IntrTxAbort and
IntrTxAborted.
I was also puzzled as to why the docs say:
Transmit Descriptor Underflow for IntrMIIChange
I am talking about the newest VT86C100A docs.
I believe Urban Widmark had a patch that redefined that interrupt but it was
never included.
next parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-18 5:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <369B0912E1F5D511ACA5003048222B75A3C06E@EXCHANGE2>
[not found] ` <20020518040143.GA9318@k3.hellgate.ch>
2002-05-17 23:13 ` Ivan G. [this message]
2002-05-18 19:11 ` [PATCH] #2 VIA Rhine stalls: TxAbort handling 'Roger Luethi'
2002-05-17 18:46 Manfred Spraul
2002-05-17 19:56 ` 'Roger Luethi'
2002-05-18 10:08 ` David Woodhouse
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-05-16 10:03 Shing Chuang
2002-05-16 18:03 ` 'Roger Luethi'
2002-05-16 18:25 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-05-16 20:31 ` 'Roger Luethi'
2002-05-16 16:39 ` Ivan G.
2002-05-16 21:05 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-05-17 0:16 ` 'Roger Luethi'
2002-05-17 12:51 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-05-17 16:25 ` 'Roger Luethi'
2002-05-16 3:13 Roger Luethi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=02051717133300.00656@cobra.linux \
--to=ivangurdiev@linuxfreemail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rl@hellgate.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox