public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <markus.stockhausen@gmx.de>
To: "'Daniel Lezcano'" <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>, <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: <howels@allthatwemight.be>, <bjorn@mork.no>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: AW: AW: [PATCH 1/4] clocksource/drivers/timer-rtl-otto: work around dying timers
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 20:16:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <020f01dc227f$03e40b60$0bac2220$@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <38633f6f-c14c-4a74-b372-cdfdab80619e@linaro.org>

> Von: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> 
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. September 2025 18:39
>
> > What I tried:
> > 
> > 1. Read out the current (remaining) timer value: In the error cases
> > this can give any value between 1 (=320ns) and 15 (=4800ns).
> > 
> > 2. Check if IRQ flag is already set and IRQ might trigger next. This was
> > never the case.
>
> It would have been interesting to check if we are in the time bug range 
> to wait with a delay (5us), check the IRQ flag as the current timer 
> should have expired, then set the counter and recheck the IRQ flag.

It's been 2 months that I dived deep into this case. Finding a 
reproducer, adding lightweight logging and try&error a solution 
was really hard. In the end I was happy to have a fix that was 
intensively tested.

For some notes see
https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/19468#issuecomment-3095570297

From what I remember:

- I started on a multithreading SoC and went over to a single
core SoC to reduce side effects during analysis. 

- The timer never died when it was reprogrammed from
an interrupt of a just finished timer. The reason was always
a reprogramming from outside the interrupt->reprogram
call sequence.

- Reprogramming always worked fine. A timer with <5us left, was 
restarted with a timer >5us. The new timer started to count.
No interrupt flag seemed to be magically toggled during this 
process. There was no active IRQ notification directly after the
reprogramming. That was how I expected it.

- But in rare cases the new timer did not trigger the subsequent
interrupt. I was totally confused that the future interrupt of 
a newly started timer did not work.

Graphically:

- timer run ---+-------------------->|
               | issue stop & start 
               | timer run ------------------>|
                                              | no IRQ here

Conclusion was for me: If we "kill" a running timer and restart 
it and it will not fire an interrupt after the newly set time, 
then something must be somehow broken. The ending timer and 
the stop/start sequence (that consists of two register writes) 
have some interference. Whatever it might be.

Markus


  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-10 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-04  8:03 [PATCH 0/4] clocksource/drivers/timer-rtl-otto: enhancements Markus Stockhausen
2025-08-04  8:03 ` [PATCH 1/4] clocksource/drivers/timer-rtl-otto: work around dying timers Markus Stockhausen
2025-09-10  9:02   ` Daniel Lezcano
2025-09-10 10:16     ` AW: " markus.stockhausen
2025-09-10 16:39       ` Daniel Lezcano
2025-09-10 18:16         ` markus.stockhausen [this message]
2025-09-10 20:53           ` AW: " Daniel Lezcano
2025-08-04  8:03 ` [PATCH 2/4] clocksource/drivers/timer-rtl-otto: drop set_counter function Markus Stockhausen
2025-08-04  8:03 ` [PATCH 3/4] clocksource/drivers/timer-rtl-otto: do not interfere with interrupts Markus Stockhausen
2025-08-04  8:03 ` [PATCH 4/4] clocksource/drivers/timer-rtl-otto: simplify documentation Markus Stockhausen
2025-09-10 20:54 ` [PATCH 0/4] clocksource/drivers/timer-rtl-otto: enhancements Daniel Lezcano
2025-09-10 21:15   ` AW: " markus.stockhausen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='020f01dc227f$03e40b60$0bac2220$@gmx.de' \
    --to=markus.stockhausen@gmx.de \
    --cc=bjorn@mork.no \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=howels@allthatwemight.be \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox