From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>, iommu@lists.linux.dev
Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] iommu/vt-d: Remove caching mode check before device TLB flush
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:02:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0231631b-44ca-45ee-adf9-0a5c8852cc27@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7e78917f-f84c-4e98-a612-73b8013ae367@intel.com>
On 2024/4/10 14:30, Yi Liu wrote:
> On 2024/4/10 13:58, Lu Baolu wrote:
>> The Caching Mode (CM) of the Intel IOMMU indicates if the hardware
>> implementation caches not-present or erroneous translation-structure
>> entries except the first-stage translation. The caching mode is
>> irrelevant to the device TLB , therefore there is no need to check
>> it before a device TLB invalidation operation.
>>
>> iommu_flush_iotlb_psi() is called in map and unmap paths. The caching
>> mode check before device TLB invalidation will cause device TLB
>> invalidation always issued if IOMMU is not running in caching mode.
>> This is wrong and causes unnecessary performance overhead.
>
> I don't think the original code is wrong. As I replied before, if CM==0,
> the iommu_flush_iotlb_psi() is only called in unmap path, in which the
> @map is false. [1] The reason to make the change is to make the logic
> simpler. 🙂
Oh, I see. There is a magic
if (cap_caching_mode(iommu->cap) && !domain->use_first_level)
iommu_flush_iotlb_psi(iommu, domain, pfn, pages, 0, 1);
in __mapping_notify_one().
So if it's caching mode, then
- iommu_flush_iotlb_psi() will be called with @map=1 from
__mapping_notify_one(), "!cap_caching_mode(iommu->cap) || !map" is
not true, and device TLB is not invalidated.
- iommu_flush_iotlb_psi() will also be called with @map=0 from
intel_iommu_tlb_sync(), device TLB is issued there.
That's the expected behavior for caching mode.
If it's not the caching mode, then
- iommu_flush_iotlb_psi() will be called with @map=0 from
intel_iommu_tlb_sync(), device TLB is issued there.
That's also the expected behavior.
So the existing code is correct but obscure and difficult to understand,
right? If so, we should make this patch as a cleanup rather than a fix.
Best regards,
baolu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-10 8:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-10 5:58 [PATCH v2 1/1] iommu/vt-d: Remove caching mode check before device TLB flush Lu Baolu
2024-04-10 6:14 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-04-10 6:30 ` Yi Liu
2024-04-10 8:02 ` Baolu Lu [this message]
2024-04-10 9:14 ` Yi Liu
2024-04-10 10:38 ` Baolu Lu
2024-04-12 9:34 ` Yi Liu
2024-04-11 13:13 ` Robin Murphy
2024-04-11 13:48 ` Baolu Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0231631b-44ca-45ee-adf9-0a5c8852cc27@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox