From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out30-124.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-124.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC6DB194120 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2024 05:29:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733462987; cv=none; b=Iq3eYSPPMdH1MWxrrKsjt923x6uF88lCbyEt+iyUzNjXUY4LJ4JyvuxNSrRCnJ9W4tR25FWHOF8X6XEU/hek6TPC60gRt5jrzndTJq/IkioRVwBTu8ZC4Nd8cDAyziX4C4VSPBkVS6dBeat1URm1Y2ymEstdjaxyzSVJrSb+nmI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733462987; c=relaxed/simple; bh=EbHoky4remtxo6zTFYXnPsy+Jw3aoDFvV6C4DGYvjBs=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=P3FuFXRN8RPO6n6hhAi61L1eE7qZn1n1CAWuoTiHvLgnJqOMRtRLv/ivlSXrLNJ2VM3US9+3FF+mkt3wc+Zgz1nQK54DZVpvt37K+73BXhVVlZS4L2oheXy5yowQybv/veoJQBXx5fdBoVDqtSdGViaqN60I1uaRewad6Itm0s4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b=w7UMkDNC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b="w7UMkDNC" DKIM-Signature:v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.alibaba.com; s=default; t=1733462981; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From:Content-Type; bh=g4QVWue6mo8zs80s5tU7lK6zhLbep1rtwd6KYeuWId0=; b=w7UMkDNCWC7jhQRnhRUNDn+VWGDYRSPoaBknTdRi4jv7Ey47+ofqvjiar+13Qvf0eaIrMCfGRva6ACEsasWlqpxMdU2QDurOK8djzfB5fFryVxWiJStDuFOfdmH5cHXngd1Cf++JSNXcyxKUqRdWNCmAdvLoNi4IEsag6d4ho1Y= Received: from 30.39.241.89(mailfrom:baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0WKvI5vS_1733462977 cluster:ay36) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Fri, 06 Dec 2024 13:29:39 +0800 Message-ID: <02358773-18dd-4aff-a466-28ae91e729d6@linux.alibaba.com> Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 13:29:36 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] Control folio sizes used for page cache memory To: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>, Ryan Roberts Cc: Andrew Morton , Hugh Dickins , Jonathan Corbet , "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" , David Hildenbrand , Lance Yang , Gavin Shan , Pankaj Raghav , Daniel Gomez , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org References: <20240717071257.4141363-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com> <480f34d0-a943-40da-9c69-2353fe311cf7@arm.com> From: Baolin Wang In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2024/12/6 13:09, Barry Song wrote: > It's unusual that many emails sent days ago are resurfacing on LKML. > Please ignore them. > By the way, does anyone know what happened? I also received many previous emails, and seems that changing the maillist spam filtering rules by the owner of linux-mm@kvack.org caused this. See: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241205154213.GA5247@kvack.org/