From: "Paul Rolland" <rol@as2917.net>
To: "'Andrey Nekrasov'" <andy@spylog.ru>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: eepro100: wait_for_cmd_done timeout
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 07:50:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <023a01c2def5$ae59a6e0$3f00a8c0@witbe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030227203013.GA25009@an.spylog.com>
Hello,
> Hello Paul Rolland,
>
> > Feb 27 13:50:01 rms-01 Feb 27 13:50:01:30726 kernel: eepro100:
> > wait_for_cmd_done timeout!
> >
> > eth0: OEM i82557/i82558 10/100 Ethernet, 00:06:5B:39:69:2B, IRQ 16.
> > Board assembly 02d484-000, Physical connectors present: RJ45
> > Primary interface chip i82555 PHY #1.
> > General self-test: passed.
> > Serial sub-system self-test: passed.
> > Internal registers self-test: passed.
> > ROM checksum self-test: passed (0x04f4518b).
> > Anyone knows why ?
>
> try update bios on motherboard.
> i am use INTEL STL2 and after update bios to last version
> network card work ok
Thanks for the suggestion...
I got another one, telling me to have a look at the e100 driver,
and this raises a question I have for quite a long time : why does
the Kernel have two different supports for the same hardware ?
Is this a migration plan, a long run "please switch from eepro100
to e100" ?
Is there a better working one ?
I don't say that, once a driver exists, no one should ever think
of doing another one, but there are little indication as to which
one people should select...
Quite puzzling ;-)
Regards,
Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-28 6:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-27 16:56 eepro100: wait_for_cmd_done timeout Paul Rolland
2003-02-27 20:30 ` Andrey Nekrasov
2003-02-28 6:50 ` Paul Rolland [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-28 11:42 Chris Bacott
2003-03-28 17:59 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-06-20 23:31 Dionysius Wilson Almeida
2001-06-20 23:51 ` Andrey Savochkin
2001-06-21 0:02 ` Dionysius Wilson Almeida
2001-06-21 13:46 ` Rafael Martinez
2001-06-22 1:36 ` Dionysius Wilson Almeida
2001-06-22 13:31 ` Andrey Savochkin
2001-06-22 20:06 ` Dionysius Wilson Almeida
2001-06-21 14:19 ` Masaru Kawashima
2001-06-21 14:37 ` John Madden
2001-06-22 1:27 ` Masaru Kawashima
2001-06-21 16:28 ` Masaru Kawashima
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='023a01c2def5$ae59a6e0$3f00a8c0@witbe' \
--to=rol@as2917.net \
--cc=andy@spylog.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox