From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES/RFC] Re: A concern about overflow ring buffer mode
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 10:33:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0247fca0-5a94-9a83-cefa-282804316729@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181029130331.GC21857@kernel.org>
On 10/29/2018 9:03 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 04:11:51PM -0400, Liang, Kan escreveu:
>> On 10/26/2018 3:24 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>>> Em Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 03:16:29PM -0400, Liang, Kan escreveu:
>>>> On 10/26/2018 3:12 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>>>>> Em Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 03:07:40PM -0400, Liang, Kan escreveu:
>>>>>> On 10/26/2018 3:02 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>>>>> I checked and both have the same result. But I still think there is
>>>>> value in having the shorter form, ok?
>
>>>> Sure.
>
>>> Ok.
>
>>> I think that we should default back to --no-overwrite till we get this
>>> sorted out, as the effect is easily noticeable, as David reported and I
>>> reproduced, when doing kernel builds.
>
>> It is mainly for performance reason to switch to overwrite mode. The impact
>> was very small when I did my test. But now the effect is easily noticeable
>> in other tests. Yes, I agree. We may change it back to non-overwrite mode
>> until the issue is addressed.
>
> So, I have these two patches in my perf/core branch, with Fixes tags
> that will make them get to the stable kernels, ok?
I just realized that the problem in KNL will be back if we switch back
to non-overwrite mode.
The problem is that users have to wait tens of minutes to see perf top
results on the screen in KNL. Before that, there is nothing but a black
screen.
Sorry I didn't notice it last Friday. Because I thought the ui_warning
in perf_top__mmap_read() can give user a hint. So the user can switch to
overwrite mode manually.
But unfortunately, the ui_warning doesn't work. Because it is called
after perf_top__mmap_read(). The processing time of
perf_top__mmap_read() could be tens of minutes.
Thanks,
Kan
>
>
> From f54ef0e7342efb77205b2faaacbcb81cdd31f064 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 15:55:23 -0300
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] perf top: Allow disabling the overwrite mode
>
> In ebebbf082357 ("perf top: Switch default mode to overwrite mode") we
> forgot to leave a way to disable that new default, add a --overwrite
> option that can be disabled using --no-overwrite, since the code already
> in such a way that we can readily disable this mode.
>
> This is useful when investigating bugs with this mode like the recent
> report from David Miller where lots of unknown symbols appear due to
> disabling the events while processing them which disables all record
> types, not just PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE, which makes it impossible to resolve
> maps when we lose PERF_RECORD_MMAP records.
>
> This can be easily seen while building a kernel, when there are lots of
> short lived processes.
>
> Reported-by: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> Acked-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
> Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
> Fixes: ebebbf082357 ("perf top: Switch default mode to overwrite mode")
> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-oqgsz2bq4kgrnnajrafcdhie@git.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/Documentation/perf-top.txt | 5 +++++
> tools/perf/builtin-top.c | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-top.txt b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-top.txt
> index 114fda12aa49..d4be6061fe1c 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-top.txt
> +++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-top.txt
> @@ -242,6 +242,11 @@ Default is to monitor all CPUS.
> --hierarchy::
> Enable hierarchy output.
>
> +--overwrite::
> + This is the default, but for investigating problems with it or any other strange
> + behaviour like lots of unknown samples, we may want to disable this mode by using
> + --no-overwrite.
> +
> --force::
> Don't do ownership validation.
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-top.c b/tools/perf/builtin-top.c
> index d21d8751e749..214fad747b04 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-top.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-top.c
> @@ -1372,6 +1372,8 @@ int cmd_top(int argc, const char **argv)
> "Show raw trace event output (do not use print fmt or plugins)"),
> OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "hierarchy", &symbol_conf.report_hierarchy,
> "Show entries in a hierarchy"),
> + OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "overwrite", &top.record_opts.overwrite,
> + "Use a backward ring buffer, default: yes"),
> OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "force", &symbol_conf.force, "don't complain, do it"),
> OPT_UINTEGER(0, "num-thread-synthesize", &top.nr_threads_synthesize,
> "number of thread to run event synthesize"),
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-29 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-26 17:45 A concern about overflow ring buffer mode David Miller
2018-10-26 18:38 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-10-26 18:42 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-10-26 19:02 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-10-26 19:07 ` Liang, Kan
2018-10-26 19:12 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-10-26 19:16 ` Liang, Kan
2018-10-26 19:24 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-10-26 20:11 ` Liang, Kan
2018-10-26 20:43 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-10-29 13:03 ` [PATCHES/RFC] " Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-10-29 14:33 ` Liang, Kan [this message]
2018-10-29 14:35 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-10-29 15:11 ` Liang, Kan
2018-10-29 17:43 ` David Miller
2018-10-29 17:56 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-10-29 17:40 ` David Miller
2018-10-29 17:42 ` Liang, Kan
2018-10-29 17:48 ` David Miller
2018-10-29 18:20 ` Liang, Kan
2018-10-29 18:32 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-10-29 22:32 ` Liang, Kan
2018-10-29 22:42 ` David Miller
2018-10-30 1:54 ` Liang, Kan
2018-10-29 21:16 ` David Miller
2018-10-29 17:55 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-10-30 19:05 ` David Miller
2018-10-31 22:03 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf top: Do not use overwrite mode by default tip-bot for Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0247fca0-5a94-9a83-cefa-282804316729@linux.intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
--cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox