From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 07:20:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 07:19:51 -0400 Received: from springer254.asv.de ([194.64.254.254]:54021 "EHLO springer254.asv.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 07:19:37 -0400 Message-ID: <026001c0edb0$fd4a5cf0$7400a8c0@dukat.cb.de> From: "Ingo T. Storm" To: Subject: Re: 2.2 <-> 2.4.5-ac5 tcp too slow (false alarm) Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 13:16:22 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3612.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3612.1700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >Right now I am compiling 2.4.5 on the clients to verify that it's an >2.2 vs 2.4 issue. It wasn't 2.4 vs. 2.2 but the tulip driver. Swapped it for a dual eepro100 and geth 8MB/s (tbench 4) now. Ingo