From: "Joseph Malicki" <jmalicki@starbak.net>
To: "William Lee Irwin III" <wli@holomorphy.com>,
"Takao Indoh" <indou.takao@soft.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "Mike Fedyk" <mfedyk@matchmail.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: cache limit
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 12:03:36 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <028801c36cb4$c5b6a3e0$65c7a244@cage> (raw)
I was premature about the test case, but still, a process (or several) that
mmap several GB's of files and dont unmap what they don't need has caused
issues in the past.
-joe
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joseph Malicki" <jmalicki@starbak.net>
To: "William Lee Irwin III" <wli@holomorphy.com>; "Takao Indoh"
<indou.takao@soft.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "Mike Fedyk" <mfedyk@matchmail.com>; <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:01 PM
Subject: Re: cache limit
> I've had experience with unneeded, *mapped* pages that would be ideally
> flushed oppressing needed mapped and unmapped pages.
> Test case: grep --mmap SOME_STRING_I_WONT_FIND some_multi-GB-file
>
> Sure, it's bad programming etc, but in that case, once those pages are
> mapped, they can't be forcibly unmapped even though
> in a utopian VM they would be discarded as unneeded.
>
> This could very well be the problem?
>
> -joe
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "William Lee Irwin III" <wli@holomorphy.com>
> To: "Takao Indoh" <indou.takao@soft.fujitsu.com>
> Cc: "Mike Fedyk" <mfedyk@matchmail.com>; <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 5:45 AM
> Subject: Re: cache limit
>
>
> > On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 06:36:10PM +0900, Takao Indoh wrote:
> > > This problem happened a few month ago and the detailed data does not
> > > remain. Therefore it is difficult to know what is essential cause for
> > > this problem, but, I guessed that pagecache used as I/O cache grew
> > > gradually during system running, and finally it oppressed memory.
> >
> > But this doesn't make any sense; the only memory you could "oppress"
> > is pagecache.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 06:36:10PM +0900, Takao Indoh wrote:
> > > Besides this problem, there are many cases where increase of pagecache
> > > causes trouble, I think.
> > > For example, DBMS.
> > > DBMS caches index of DB in their process space.
> > > This index cache conflicts with the pagecache used by other
> applications,
> > > and index cache may be paged out. It cause uneven response of DBMS.
> > > In this case, limiting pagecache is effective.
> >
> > Why is it effective? You're describing pagecache vs. pagecache
> > competition and the DBMS outcompeting the cooperating applications for
> > memory to the detriment of the workload; this is a very different
> > scenario from what "limiting pagecache" sounds like.
> >
> > How do you know it would be effective? Have you written a patch to
> > limit it in some way and tried running it?
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 02:46:34 -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> > >> One thing I thought of after the post was whether they actually had
in
> > >> mind tunable hard limits on _unmapped_ pagecache, which is, in fact,
> > >> useful. OTOH that's largely speculation and we really need them to
> > >> articulate the true nature of their problem.
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 06:36:10PM +0900, Takao Indoh wrote:
> > > I also think that is effective. Empirically, in the case where
pagecache
> > > causes memory shortage, most of pagecache is unmapped page. Of course
> > > real problem may not be pagecashe, as you or Mike said.
> >
> > How do you know most of it is unmapped?
> >
> > At any rate, the above assigns a meaningful definition to the words you
> > used; it does not necessarily have anything to do with the issue you're
> > trying to describe. If you could start from the very basics, reproduce
> > the problem, instrument the workload with top(1) and vmstat(1), and find
> > some way to describe how the performance is inadequate (e.g. performance
> > metrics for your running DBMS/whatever in MB/s or transactions/s etc.),
> > it would be much more helpful than proposing a solution up front.
> > Without any evidence, we can't know it is a solution at all, or that
> > it's the right solution.
> >
> >
> > -- wli
> > -
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >
>
next reply other threads:[~2003-08-27 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-27 16:03 Joseph Malicki [this message]
[not found] <000801c36cb1$454d4950$1001a8c0@etofmv650>
2003-08-27 16:02 ` cache limit YoshiyaETO
[not found] <oJ5P.699.21@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <oJ5P.699.23@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <oJ5P.699.25@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <oJ5P.699.27@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <oJ5P.699.19@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <oQh2.4bQ.13@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-08-26 19:08 ` Ihar 'Philips' Filipau
2003-08-26 19:23 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-27 10:21 ` Ihar 'Philips' Filipau
2003-08-27 11:07 ` Nick Piggin
[not found] <n7lV.2HA.19@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <ofAJ.4dx.9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <ogZM.5KJ.1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <oyDw.5FP.33@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-08-26 10:15 ` Ihar 'Philips' Filipau
2003-08-26 17:46 ` Mike Fedyk
[not found] <m6Bv.3ys.1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <mLY8.dO.5@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-08-21 9:52 ` Ihar 'Philips' Filipau
2003-08-25 7:17 ` Takao Indoh
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-08-19 4:39 Anthony R.
2003-08-19 4:57 ` Nuno Silva
2003-08-19 5:33 ` Denis Vlasenko
2003-08-19 6:20 ` Andrew Morton
2003-08-19 9:05 ` J.A. Magallon
2003-08-19 9:16 ` Andrew Morton
2003-08-19 9:28 ` J.A. Magallon
2003-08-19 9:43 ` Andrew Morton
2003-08-19 13:32 ` Erik Andersen
2003-08-19 20:56 ` Andrew Morton
2003-08-19 14:28 ` Anthony R.
2003-08-19 18:26 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-19 5:42 ` Nick Piggin
2003-08-21 0:49 ` Takao Indoh
2003-08-21 23:47 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-25 2:45 ` Takao Indoh
2003-08-25 4:11 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-08-25 22:58 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-26 9:46 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-08-27 9:36 ` Takao Indoh
2003-08-27 9:45 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-08-27 11:14 ` Takao Indoh
2003-08-27 11:36 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-09-02 10:52 ` Takao Indoh
2003-09-02 11:30 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-09-02 17:21 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-27 16:01 ` Joseph Malicki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='028801c36cb4$c5b6a3e0$65c7a244@cage' \
--to=jmalicki@starbak.net \
--cc=indou.takao@soft.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox