From: "Chanho Park" <chanho61.park@samsung.com>
To: "'Krzysztof Kozlowski'" <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>,
"'Arnd Bergmann'" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"'Olof Johansson'" <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: "'Jaewon Kim'" <jaewon02.kim@samsung.com>,
"'David Virag'" <virag.david003@gmail.com>,
"'Youngmin Nam'" <youngmin.nam@samsung.com>,
"'Sam Protsenko'" <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-serial@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"'Greg Kroah-Hartman'" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
"'Rob Herring'" <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 0/5] soc: samsung: Add USI driver
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2021 18:13:03 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <02a001d7ec13$ce088e80$6a19ab80$@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <14731ee8-bc9a-8973-2bcf-e7a771ac3c07@canonical.com>
Hi,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 3:24 AM
> To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>; Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
> Cc: Jaewon Kim <jaewon02.kim@samsung.com>; Chanho Park
> <chanho61.park@samsung.com>; David Virag <virag.david003@gmail.com>;
> Youngmin Nam <youngmin.nam@samsung.com>; Sam Protsenko
> <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> serial@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Greg Kroah-
> Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] soc: samsung: Add USI driver
>
> On 05/12/2021 17:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 04/12/2021 20:57, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> >> USIv2 IP-core provides selectable serial protocol (UART, SPI or
> >> High-Speed I2C); only one can be chosen at a time. This series
> >> implements USIv2 driver, which allows one to select particular USI
> >> function in device tree, and also performs USI block initialization.
> >>
> >> With that driver implemented, it's not needed to do USI
> >> initialization in protocol drivers anymore, so that code is removed
> >> from the serial driver.
> >>
> >> Because USI driver is tristate (can be built as a module), serial
> >> driver was reworked so it's possible to use its console part as a
> module too.
> >> This way we can load serial driver module from user space and still
> >> have serial console functional.
> >>
> >> Design features:
> >> - "reg" property contains USI registers start address (0xc0 offset);
> >> it's used in the driver to access USI_CON and USI_OPTION registers.
> >> This way all USI initialization (reset, HWACG, etc) can be done in
> >> USIv2 driver separately, rather than duplicating that code over
> >> UART/SPI/I2C drivers
> >> - System Register (system controller node) and its SW_CONF register
> >> offset are provided in "samsung,sysreg" property; it's used to
> >> select USI function (protocol to be used)
> >> - USI function is specified in "samsung,mode" property; integer value
> >> is used to simplify parsing
> >> - there is "samsung,clkreq-on" bool property, which makes driver
> >> disable HWACG control (needed for UART to work properly)
> >> - PCLK and IPCLK clocks are both provided to USI node; apparently
> both
> >> need to be enabled to access USI registers
> >> - protocol nodes are embedded (as a child nodes) in USI node; it
> >> allows correct init order, and reflects HW properly
> >> - USI driver is a tristate: can be also useful from Android GKI
> >> requirements point of view
> >> - driver functions are implemented with further development in mind:
> >> - we might want to add some DebugFs interface later
> >> - some functions might need to be revealed to serial drivers with
> >> EXPORT_SYMBOL(), and provide somehow pointer to needed USI driver
> >> instance
> >> - another USI revisions could be added (like USIv1)
> >>
> >> Changes in v3:
> >> - Renamed compatible from samsung,exynos-usi-v2 to samsung,exynos850-
> usi
> >> - Used clk_bulk API instead of handling each clock separately
> >> - Spell check fixes and coding style fixes
> >> - Improved dt-bindings doc
> >>
> >> Changes in v2:
> >> - Renamed all 'usi_v2' wording to just 'usi' everywhere
> >> - Removed patches adding dependency on EXYNOS_USI for UART/I2C/SPI
> >> drivers
> >> - Added patch: "tty: serial: samsung: Fix console registration from
> >> module"
> >> - Combined dt-bindings doc and dt-bindings header patches
> >> - Reworked USI driver to be ready for USIv1 addition
> >> - Improved dt-bindings
> >> - Added USI_V2_NONE mode value
> >>
> >> Sam Protsenko (5):
> >> dt-bindings: soc: samsung: Add Exynos USI bindings
> >> soc: samsung: Add USI driver
> >> tty: serial: samsung: Remove USI initialization
> >> tty: serial: samsung: Enable console as module
> >> tty: serial: samsung: Fix console registration from module
> >>
> >
> > All this looks good to me. The serial driver changes should come
> > together with this one (usi driver is now a dependency for them). If I
> > am correct, mention this please in future cover letter (if there is
> such).
> >
> > I will still need DTSI changes for Exynos Auto v9 and confirmation
> > that is not being used downstream and breaking DTB ABI is okay.
> > Because this will be a non-bisctable and also a DTB ABI break.
>
> +CC Arnd and Olof,
>
> Dear Arnd and Olof,
>
> The patchset discussed here reworks recently added USI code to Samsung
> Exynos UART driver in a non-bisectable and ABI-breaking way. The existing
> code in serial driver was added in v5.15-rc1, however first user - Exyons
> Auto v9 - appeared in v5.16-rc1.
>
> The bisectability and ABI break will affect only newly upstreamed Samsung
> Exynos SoC, so for now only Exynos Auto v9.
>
> The early code has some drawbacks and limitations which came up now when
> we want to extend the USI code to support more blocks (I2C, SPI) and
> devices (including older Exynos chipsets). Therefore I am planning to make
> an ABI break of this features because:
> 1. The code was added recently (v5.15-rc1) and users even later (v5.16-
> rc1).
> 2. Even though code was merged, I consider it still development phase.
> Kernel development goes very fast and we do not defer patches waiting for
> perfect solution.
> 3. There are no known out-of-tree users of this because this is fairly new.
> For this I am waiting for confirmation from Chanho (and/or other Samsung
> folks). I don't expect there are out of tree users because any mobile or
> automotive product will take Samsung vendor sources and recent kernels are
> not a base for Samsung vendor kernels.
This will be not an issue in my case. Please apply below patch with this series.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-samsung-soc/20211208003946.139423-1-chanho61.park@samsung.com/T/#u
Best Regards,
Chanho Park
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-08 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20211204195806epcas2p15410815b695603ef2429fc55730ddb21@epcas2p1.samsung.com>
2021-12-04 19:57 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] soc: samsung: Add USI driver Sam Protsenko
2021-12-04 19:57 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] dt-bindings: soc: samsung: Add Exynos USI bindings Sam Protsenko
2021-12-06 21:02 ` Rob Herring
2021-12-13 11:12 ` (subset) " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-12-04 19:57 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] soc: samsung: Add USI driver Sam Protsenko
2021-12-13 11:12 ` (subset) " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-12-04 19:57 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] tty: serial: samsung: Remove USI initialization Sam Protsenko
2021-12-13 11:00 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-12-13 11:31 ` Sam Protsenko
2021-12-13 11:33 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-12-13 11:35 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-12-20 15:21 ` Sam Protsenko
2021-12-20 15:55 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-12-04 19:57 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] tty: serial: samsung: Enable console as module Sam Protsenko
2021-12-13 11:35 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-12-04 19:57 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] tty: serial: samsung: Fix console registration from module Sam Protsenko
2021-12-13 11:39 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-12-05 16:24 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] soc: samsung: Add USI driver Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-12-06 18:23 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-12-08 9:13 ` Chanho Park [this message]
2021-12-08 9:15 ` Chanho Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='02a001d7ec13$ce088e80$6a19ab80$@samsung.com' \
--to=chanho61.park@samsung.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jaewon02.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=semen.protsenko@linaro.org \
--cc=virag.david003@gmail.com \
--cc=youngmin.nam@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox