From: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
To: Sayali Patil <sayalip@linux.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, maddy@linux.ibm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
chleroy@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc/time: remove preempt_disable/enable from arch_irq_work_raise()
Date: Thu, 7 May 2026 19:06:58 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <02b09dd2-abb4-4df6-9ad3-74812f34cd60@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a64fa7d86da51f78743bee26e16ae155c43016c7.1778057685.git.sayalip@linux.ibm.com>
On 5/6/26 2:36 PM, Sayali Patil wrote:
> A kernel panic is observed when handling machine check exceptions from
> real mode.
>
> BUG: Unable to handle kernel data access on read at 0xc00000006be21300
> Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
> NIP [c000000000029e40] arch_irq_work_raise+0x10/0x70
> LR [c00000000003ffc8] machine_check_queue_event+0xa8/0x150
> Call Trace:
> [c0000000179d3c70] [c00000000003ff64] machine_check_queue_event+0x44/0x150
> [c0000000179d3d30] [c0000000000084e0] machine_check_early_common+0x1f0/0x2c0
>
> The crash occurs because arch_irq_work_raise() calls preempt_disable()
> from machine check exception (MCE) handlers running in real mode. In
> this context, accessing the preempt_count can fault, leading to the panic.
>
> The preempt_disable()/preempt_enable() pair in arch_irq_work_raise()
> was originally added by commit 0fe1ac48bef0 ("powerpc/perf_event: Fix
> oops due to perf_event_do_pending call") to avoid races while raising
> irq work from exception context.
>
> Later, commit 471ba0e686cb ("irq_work: Do not raise an IPI when
> queueing work on the local CPU") added preemption protection in
> irq_work_queue() path, while commit 20b876918c06 ("irq_work: Use per
> cpu atomics instead of regular atomics") added equivalent
> protection in irq_work_queue_on() before reaching arch_irq_work_raise():
>
> irq_work_queue() / irq_work_queue_on()
> -> preempt_disable()
> -> __irq_work_queue_local()
> -> irq_work_raise()
> -> arch_irq_work_raise()
>
> As a result, callers other than mce_irq_work_raise() already execute
> with preemption disabled, making the additional
> preempt_disable()/preempt_enable() pair in arch_irq_work_raise()
> redundant.
>
> Remove it to avoid accessing preempt_count from real mode context.
I assume interrupt is disabled here. So it should be functionally safe
to remove it.
>
> Fixes: cc15ff327569 ("powerpc/mce: Avoid using irq_work_queue() in realmode")
> Suggested-by: Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sayali Patil <sayalip@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c
> index 4bbeb8644d3d..a99eb43f6ce9 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c
> @@ -471,10 +471,8 @@ void arch_irq_work_raise(void)
Could you please add a comment for the function that it expects to
be called with preemption_disabled?
> * which could get tangled up if we're messing with the same state
> * here.
> */
> - preempt_disable();
> set_irq_work_pending_flag();
> set_dec(1);
> - preempt_enable();
> }
>
> static void set_dec_or_work(u64 val)
Acked-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-07 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-06 9:06 [PATCH 0/3] MCE robustness fixes and LKDTM powerpc enhancements Sayali Patil
2026-05-06 9:06 ` [PATCH 1/3] powerpc/time: remove preempt_disable/enable from arch_irq_work_raise() Sayali Patil
2026-05-07 13:36 ` Shrikanth Hegde [this message]
2026-05-06 9:06 ` [PATCH 2/3] lkdtm/powerpc: add isync after slbmte to enforce SLB update ordering Sayali Patil
2026-05-06 9:06 ` [PATCH 3/3] lkdtm/powerpc: add PPC_RADIX_TLBIEL test for radix MCE validation Sayali Patil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=02b09dd2-abb4-4df6-9ad3-74812f34cd60@linux.ibm.com \
--to=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=sayalip@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox