From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750890AbdAXMrm (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2017 07:47:42 -0500 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]:62183 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750758AbdAXMrk (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2017 07:47:40 -0500 Subject: Re: KVM: s390: Move two error code assignments in kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log() To: =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_Borntr=c3=a4ger?= , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org References: <70f41e59-d8a4-de42-6064-80ecf6acc065@users.sourceforge.net> <35411200-2bd6-1c65-7d7f-21a6353875ea@de.ibm.com> <01d581bb-9db6-cba1-e476-49c814c3ebf0@users.sourceforge.net> <50ae2ba4-572d-8524-fc31-acc1a8d1ad99@de.ibm.com> <75c6315c-8947-2816-64da-947f6a29ac57@users.sourceforge.net> <64b94d75-6bad-1ebc-c35e-c036202bab01@redhat.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Cornelia Huck , Heiko Carstens , Martin Schwidefsky , =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: <02eaa91d-55d7-ce02-3db8-a7db5d1ff679@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 13:47:26 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:cOjZuCdt4blh7jk2KDMBAw0xBKXSHqy2zJA9pxZtlByIlp9FgmF wBmegcsmoxZMF6+bRczDWV99c5y8I0tCiKjAWOkgNgiN6kEWuUxIbqfEjRBYsNPONHP0TY8 yPuirfVaXeOJuH6flKg56PF9hLmL/B1XDdnsoRoLf5KulVcAxJ2f5fY4vPl3e5lprZ630Rk 29jeZLaGmpLTDWkmVXfbw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:Unq05pz6xaA=:R7jTpdq2koDANsfNlbALPh fSba3OpX+pmyUW9ut5ep6/xMDpcemhTdrfilCTlq26h2dgTwg4ZBDHYXgZ9X2BdHBMaT/BQqS V2DoYLss6AsLgzhYVIFcnIGXkNXVZyolT2NLBK4narMmtxsroU+z6lrMPPDPNiOmio0XTJUB0 ZUl9mg0mkROnhrOq5fpd0YnY4hsHBE7VrnI4XXcpF9VSzcTFoVZnmWz+Ek9EsAann0fQ+J0pb EKmME9Zy8gDxkJszuJybHMFnEmqA85gYpM78AGy2JSMR0+prO903j/ZZgcv2z6NvtaKMiTuOG r7N5EdI0iE4BdGfWPKHQQ/QYWPZYC5YCwqNXmm9lyOPJRwyyndpfgtqTbHYmb99eH/6Lu69b9 Eh7DhQi7UQbYgJ4aYFOgiuWcSDZS8pIXcSW0VrJxSP25UG+jl7G6s3JErPVWW+RiUyoL4xbdO +rvGsbk58TifmrdxMl66DM7xHyNb3vg3QUhBn7iYDXtbANHGb+bOJBszvFMpuLrkUPyOpWw4s CDet/P9F03N5SGdDQx2uqXf7q0SGvR0SZutRnjrUam+Qf+xGa4jzpmQsvfaNbiUGOYtWqkdqP K+F7sN7O1QaiXgt1uLDsEzgxnH+p4tXMrd44ZYxFpUXZpHJXtwYmzCU/on1jMxM9+/EUSYOR+ 5gJnW/XOx4ehazN3IXgydQ/4BUVuc2RgSK8bnB9lUn3OA3nbfU4lspdVDEwnX3lQuNc2ET2JS cNJ4yU4TOwvxhv4afI9eOyYjIbH+VAuhTfalOa/G4sEYzamGo5ahTsnn99QfdMyTYuYjAScxR SJOXVgI Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> I am curious if other update suggestions will be picked up >> in a constructive way. > > There is only one person on this list that is not constructive, You could accept a few patches from my selection of change possibilities already. > and that person is you. I assume that some dialogue steps would be needed to find a “common wave length” again so that the communication might become useful also in your view. Regards, Markus