Re: top stack (l)users for 2.5.69

Jesse Pollard
2003-05-07T21:19:14Z

On Wednesday 07 May 2003 12:13, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
[snip]
> One thing that would help (aside from separate interrupt stacks)
> would be a guard page below the stack. That wouldn't require any
> physical memory to be reserved, and would provide positive indication
> of stack overflow without significant runtime overhead.

It does take up a page table entry, which may also be in short supply