public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesse Pollard <jesse@cats-chateau.net>
To: "Downing, Thomas" <Thomas.Downing@ipc.com>,
	"'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Troll Tech [was RE: Sco vs. IBM]
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 13:58:34 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <03061913583400.25866@tabby> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <170EBA504C3AD511A3FE00508BB89A920234CD34@exnanycmbx4.ipc.com>

On Thursday 19 June 2003 12:37, Downing, Thomas wrote:
> I'm no authority, but IMHO
>
> > In article <20030619141443.GR29247@fs.tum.de>,
> >
> > Adrian Bunk  <bunk@fs.tum.de> wrote:
[snip]
> > Which makes no sense. You're not at the mercy of Linus or the
> > kernel developers, neither at that of the KDE developers, but
> > TrollTech controls the KDE desktop wrt commercial apps.
>
> No, they don't.  KDE uses the GPL for QT.  If I build a commercial
> app using KDE, it is GPL.  If I build a commercial app not using
> KDE, but using commercial QT, that has no effect on the KDE desktop.

Lets see...

SCO releases Linux code under GPL...
IBM releases code based on Linux...
SCO now changes mind...

And the lawyers gather...

Personally, I don't see a difference...

  reply	other threads:[~2003-06-19 18:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-06-19 17:37 Troll Tech [was RE: Sco vs. IBM] Downing, Thomas
2003-06-19 18:58 ` Jesse Pollard [this message]
2003-06-19 19:08   ` Thorsten Körner
2003-06-19 19:30     ` Jesse Pollard
2003-06-19 19:38       ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-06-19 19:41       ` Thorsten Körner
2003-06-19 19:48         ` Robert L. Harris
2003-06-19 20:18       ` Erik Hensema
2003-06-20 12:15         ` Jesse Pollard
2003-06-19 21:06       ` Richard Braakman
2003-06-19 19:31     ` Scott McDermott
2003-06-19 19:44       ` Thorsten Körner
2003-06-21  6:29 ` John K Luebs
2003-06-21  7:20   ` Bernd Eckenfels
2003-06-24 14:17 ` Timothy Miller
2003-06-24 15:41   ` Alan Cox
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-06-06 16:22 SCO's claims seem empty Paul Rolland
2003-06-19 13:03 ` Sco vs. IBM Martin List-Petersen
2003-06-19 13:14   ` Jesse Pollard
2003-06-19 14:14     ` Adrian Bunk
2003-06-19 16:34       ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2003-06-19 16:59         ` Troll Tech [was Re: Sco vs. IBM] Larry McVoy
2003-06-19 17:13           ` ismail (cartman) donmez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=03061913583400.25866@tabby \
    --to=jesse@cats-chateau.net \
    --cc=Thomas.Downing@ipc.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox