public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>
To: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jiaan Lu <jiaan.lu@intel.com>,
	Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
	Zhang Chen <chen.zhang@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
	Daniel Sneddon <daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com>,
	Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>,
	Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@amd.com>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
	Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com>,
	Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 05/11] x86/bugs: Use Virtual MSRs to request hardware mitigations
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 21:43:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0312c900-fa7d-2ae5-22f7-956a7517193c@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230414062545.270178-6-chao.gao@intel.com>


On 4/14/2023 2:25 PM, Chao Gao wrote:
> From: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
>
> Guests that have different family/model than the host may not be aware
> of hardware mitigations(such as RRSBA_DIS_S) available on host. This is
> particularly true when guests migrate. To solve this problem Intel
> processors have added a virtual MSR interface through which guests can
> report their mitigation status and request VMM to deploy relevant
> hardware mitigations.
>
> Use this virtualized MSR interface to request relevant hardware controls
> for retpoline mitigation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
> Co-developed-by: Zhang Chen <chen.zhang@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen <chen.zhang@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Jiaan Lu <jiaan.lu@intel.com>
> ---
>   arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c       | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 50 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> index 60b25d87b82c..aec213f0c6fc 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> @@ -166,6 +166,7 @@
>   						 * IA32_XAPIC_DISABLE_STATUS MSR
>   						 * supported
>   						 */
> +#define ARCH_CAP_VIRTUAL_ENUM		BIT_ULL(63) /* MSR_VIRTUAL_ENUMERATION supported */
>   
>   #define MSR_IA32_FLUSH_CMD		0x0000010b
>   #define L1D_FLUSH			BIT(0)	/*
> @@ -1103,6 +1104,30 @@
>   #define MSR_IA32_VMX_MISC_INTEL_PT                 (1ULL << 14)
>   #define MSR_IA32_VMX_MISC_VMWRITE_SHADOW_RO_FIELDS (1ULL << 29)
>   #define MSR_IA32_VMX_MISC_PREEMPTION_TIMER_SCALE   0x1F
> +
> +/* Intel virtual MSRs */
> +#define MSR_VIRTUAL_ENUMERATION			0x50000000
> +#define VIRT_ENUM_MITIGATION_CTRL_SUPPORT	BIT(0)	/*
> +							 * Mitigation ctrl via virtual
> +							 * MSRs supported
> +							 */
> +
> +#define MSR_VIRTUAL_MITIGATION_ENUM		0x50000001
> +#define MITI_ENUM_BHB_CLEAR_SEQ_S_SUPPORT	BIT(0)	/* VMM supports BHI_DIS_S */
> +#define MITI_ENUM_RETPOLINE_S_SUPPORT		BIT(1)	/* VMM supports RRSBA_DIS_S */
> +
> +#define MSR_VIRTUAL_MITIGATION_CTRL		0x50000002
> +#define MITI_CTRL_BHB_CLEAR_SEQ_S_USED_BIT	0	/*
> +							 * Request VMM to deploy
> +							 * BHI_DIS_S mitigation
> +							 */
> +#define MITI_CTRL_BHB_CLEAR_SEQ_S_USED		BIT(MITI_CTRL_BHB_CLEAR_SEQ_S_USED_BIT)

Seems it is defined, but not used to request VMM to deploy BHI_DIS_S 
mitigation?


And IMO, it is more natual to put this patch after the four capability 
advertising patches.


> +#define MITI_CTRL_RETPOLINE_S_USED_BIT		1	/*
> +							 * Request VMM to deploy
> +							 * RRSBA_DIS_S mitigation
> +							 */
> +#define MITI_CTRL_RETPOLINE_S_USED		BIT(MITI_CTRL_RETPOLINE_S_USED_BIT)
> +
>   /* AMD-V MSRs */
>   
>   #define MSR_VM_CR                       0xc0010114
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> index f9d060e71c3e..5326c03d9d5e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
> @@ -1435,6 +1435,27 @@ static void __init spectre_v2_determine_rsb_fill_type_at_vmexit(enum spectre_v2_
>   	dump_stack();
>   }
>   
> +/* Speculation control using virtualized MSRs */
> +static void spec_ctrl_setup_virtualized_msr(void)
> +{
> +	u64 msr_virt_enum, msr_mitigation_enum;
> +
> +	/* When retpoline is being used, request relevant hardware controls */
> +	if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_RETPOLINE))
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (!(x86_read_arch_cap_msr() & ARCH_CAP_VIRTUAL_ENUM))
> +		return;
> +
> +	rdmsrl(MSR_VIRTUAL_ENUMERATION, msr_virt_enum);
> +	if (!(msr_virt_enum & VIRT_ENUM_MITIGATION_CTRL_SUPPORT))
> +		return;
> +
> +	rdmsrl(MSR_VIRTUAL_MITIGATION_ENUM, msr_mitigation_enum);
> +	if (msr_mitigation_enum & MITI_ENUM_RETPOLINE_S_SUPPORT)
> +		msr_set_bit(MSR_VIRTUAL_MITIGATION_CTRL, MITI_CTRL_RETPOLINE_S_USED_BIT);
> +}
> +
>   static void __init spectre_v2_select_mitigation(void)
>   {
>   	enum spectre_v2_mitigation_cmd cmd = spectre_v2_parse_cmdline();
> @@ -1546,6 +1567,8 @@ static void __init spectre_v2_select_mitigation(void)
>   	    mode == SPECTRE_V2_RETPOLINE)
>   		spec_ctrl_disable_kernel_rrsba();
>   
> +	spec_ctrl_setup_virtualized_msr();
> +
>   	spectre_v2_enabled = mode;
>   	pr_info("%s\n", spectre_v2_strings[mode]);
>   
> @@ -2115,6 +2138,8 @@ void x86_spec_ctrl_setup_ap(void)
>   
>   	if (ssb_mode == SPEC_STORE_BYPASS_DISABLE)
>   		x86_amd_ssb_disable();
> +
> +	spec_ctrl_setup_virtualized_msr();
>   }
>   
>   bool itlb_multihit_kvm_mitigation;

  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-17 13:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-14  6:25 [RFC PATCH v2 00/11] Intel IA32_SPEC_CTRL Virtualization Chao Gao
2023-04-14  6:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/11] x86/msr-index: Add bit definitions for BHI_DIS_S and BHI_NO Chao Gao
2023-04-14  9:52   ` Binbin Wu
2023-04-14  6:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/11] KVM: x86: Advertise CPUID.7.2.EDX and RRSBA_CTRL support Chao Gao
2023-04-16  7:04   ` Binbin Wu
2023-04-16 13:25     ` Chao Gao
2023-05-15  6:53   ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-05-16  2:04     ` Chao Gao
2023-05-16  2:22       ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-05-16  3:01         ` Chao Gao
2023-05-16  7:03           ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-05-16  9:09             ` Chao Gao
2023-05-18  9:50               ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-05-19  9:43                 ` Chao Gao
2023-04-14  6:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/11] KVM: x86: Advertise BHI_CTRL support Chao Gao
2023-05-15  7:14   ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-04-14  6:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/11] KVM: VMX: Add IA32_SPEC_CTRL virtualization support Chao Gao
2023-04-17  3:17   ` Binbin Wu
2023-04-18  2:07     ` Chao Gao
2023-04-17  6:48   ` Chenyi Qiang
2023-04-17  7:31     ` Chao Gao
2023-05-16  7:16   ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-05-16  9:20     ` Chao Gao
2023-04-14  6:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/11] x86/bugs: Use Virtual MSRs to request hardware mitigations Chao Gao
2023-04-17 13:43   ` Binbin Wu [this message]
2023-04-18  2:01     ` Chao Gao
2023-04-14  6:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/11] KVM: x86: Advertise ARCH_CAP_VIRTUAL_ENUM support Chao Gao
2023-05-18 10:14   ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-05-19  9:57     ` Chao Gao
2023-05-22  1:02       ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-04-14  6:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/11] KVM: VMX: Advertise MITIGATION_CTRL support Chao Gao
2023-04-14  6:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/11] KVM: VMX: Advertise MITI_ENUM_RETPOLINE_S_SUPPORT Chao Gao
2023-05-18 10:25   ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-05-19 10:26     ` Chao Gao
2023-05-22  9:43   ` Liu, Jingqi
2023-04-14  6:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/11] KVM: VMX: Advertise MITI_CTRL_BHB_CLEAR_SEQ_S_SUPPORT Chao Gao
2023-05-22  9:41   ` Liu, Jingqi
2023-04-14  6:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/11] KVM: selftests: Add tests for virtual enumeration/mitigation MSRs Chao Gao
2023-05-22  9:39   ` Liu, Jingqi
2023-04-14  6:25 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/11] KVM: selftests: Add tests for IA32_SPEC_CTRL MSR Chao Gao
2023-04-14  9:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/11] Intel IA32_SPEC_CTRL Virtualization Binbin Wu
2023-04-14 22:10   ` Pawan Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0312c900-fa7d-2ae5-22f7-956a7517193c@linux.intel.com \
    --to=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexandre.chartre@oracle.com \
    --cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=chen.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jiaan.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=kim.phillips@amd.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nikunj@amd.com \
    --cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox