public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "karl malbrain" <karl@petzent.com>
To: "Linux-Os@Analogic. Com" <linux-os@analogic.com>
Cc: "Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: 2.6.9: serial_core: uart_open
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 13:32:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <031d01c58720$e2844670$4b010059@petzent.com> (raw)

>On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, karl malbrain wrote:
>
>>> On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, karl malbrain wrote:
>>
>>>> The uart_open code loops waiting for CD to be asserted (whenever CLOCAL
>>>> is not set).  The bottom of the loop contains the following code:
>>>>
>>>> up(&state->sem);
>>>> schedule();
>>>> down(&state->sem);
>>>>
>>>> if( signal_pending(current) )
>>>>   break;
>>>>
>>>> When I issue an open("/dev/ttyS1", O_RDWR) from a terminal session on
>>>> the console, the system seems to come to a stop in this loop until the
>>>> process is killed.  I suspect that the scheduler is choosing this
process
>>>> to run again because of an elevated console priority of some sort.
>>>>
>>>> Is there a kernel mechanism to put a process to sleep until awakened by
>>>> an event to replace this looping behaviour?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, karl malbrain, malbrain-at-yahoo-dot-com
>>>>
>>>
>>> In the first place, you should perform an open(O_NDELAY), so the open
>>> returns immediately with anything that has potential "modem-control".
>>> Then you can set the device to blocking using fcntl(F_GETFL), F_SETFL.
>>
>>> Also, the task that is waiting for the open() is sleeping. That's
>>> what schedule() does.
>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Dick Johnson
>>
>> I'm looking for the POSIX behaviour of delaying the open until CD is
>> asserted by the modem.  If schedule() doesn't select another process to
run,

>schedule() gives the CPU to any runnable process. That's how it works.
>Most all drivers that are waiting for an event will give up the CPU
>by executing schedule(). That's how-come you can be doing something
>useful while file-I/O is occurring.

That looks like a problem.  If uart_open is just calling schedule() and if
the current process running in uart_open is being selected again, the system
is hung.

>> no wonder the system is hung at this point, because the uart_open loop
>> doesn't break until CD is asserted by the modem.  This sounds like a
serious
>> bug.

>You need to look at your code.

The code:
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>

int main (void)
{
int fd = open ("/dev/ttyS1");
printf("Opened\n");
}

>
> karl_m
>
>There is no bug although there may be a bug in your code.
>Just do `cat /dev/ttyS1` or whatever your device is. It will
>wait on the open if modem-control is enabled, and you can see
>from another terminal that nothing is spinning.

>$ ps laxw | grep cat
>
>0     0 11555  2791  17   0  3512  348 -      S    tty2       0:00 cat
/dev/ttyS0
>                                               |
>                                               |__ clearly sleeping
>
>0     0 11610 11556  16   0  3656  568 -      R    tty3       0:00 grep cat

Are you sure that CLOCAL is not set on /dev/ttyS0? and that the cat is not
sleeping on a read???  That's my original question: how can uart_open be
changed to put the process to sleep rather than looping like it does now.

>Cheers,
>Dick Johnson

karl m




             reply	other threads:[~2005-07-12 20:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-07-12 20:32 karl malbrain [this message]
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.61.0507151150290.11664@chaos.analogic.com>
2005-07-15 16:57 ` 2.6.9: serial_core: uart_open karl malbrain
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.61.0507130850110.18969@chaos.analogic.com>
2005-07-13 17:53 ` karl malbrain
2005-07-14  8:26   ` Russell King
2005-07-14 17:16     ` karl malbrain
2005-07-14 18:57       ` Russell King
2005-07-14 19:30         ` karl malbrain
2005-07-14 22:35         ` karl malbrain
2005-07-15  7:28           ` Russell King
2005-07-15 16:02             ` karl malbrain
2005-07-15 20:32               ` Russell King
2005-07-15 20:48                 ` karl malbrain
2005-07-15 16:20             ` karl malbrain
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-07-12 19:27 karl malbrain
2005-07-12 18:36 karl malbrain
2005-07-12 21:03 ` Russell King
2005-07-12 21:17   ` karl malbrain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='031d01c58720$e2844670$4b010059@petzent.com' \
    --to=karl@petzent.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-os@analogic.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox