Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: ufs: Put SCSI host after remove it

[cang@codeaurora.org]

On 2019-12-17 01:39, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 12/16/19 6:31 AM, cang@codeaurora.org wrote:
>> As SCSI host is allocated in ufshcd_platform_init() during platform
>> drive probe, it is much more appropriate if platform driver calls
>> ufshcd_dealloc_host() in their own drv->remove() path. How do you
>> think if I change it as below? If it is OK to you, please ignore my
>> previous mails.
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
>> index 3d4582e..ea45756 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
>> @@ -3239,6 +3239,7 @@ static int ufs_qcom_remove(struct 
>> platform_device *pdev)
>> 
>>          pm_runtime_get_sync(&(pdev)->dev);
>>          ufshcd_remove(hba);
>> +       ufshcd_dealloc_host(hba);
>>          return 0;
>>   }
> 
> Hi Can,
> 
> Apparently some UFS drivers call ufshcd_remove() only and others
> (PCIe) call both ufshcd_remove() and ufshcd_dealloc_host(). I think
> that the above change will cause trouble for the PCIe driver unless
> the ufshcd_dealloc_host() call is removed from ufshcd_pci_remove().
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bart.

Hi Bart,

You may get me wrong. I mean we should do like what ufshcd-pci.c does.
As driver probe routine allocates SCSI host, then driver remove() should
de-allocate it. Meaning ufs_qcom_remove() should call both 
ufshcd_remove()
and ufshcd_dealloc_host().

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
index 3d4582e..ea45756 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c
@@ -3239,6 +3239,7 @@ static int ufs_qcom_remove(struct platform_device 
*pdev)

           pm_runtime_get_sync(&(pdev)->dev);
           ufshcd_remove(hba);
  +       ufshcd_dealloc_host(hba);
           return 0;
    }

Thanks,

Can Guo.